363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12703717)
1. Speech recognition under conditions of frequency-place compression and expansion.
Baskent D; Shannon RV
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Apr; 113(4 Pt 1):2064-76. PubMed ID: 12703717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Frequency-place compression and expansion in cochlear implant listeners.
Başkent D; Shannon RV
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Nov; 116(5):3130-40. PubMed ID: 15603158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interactions between cochlear implant electrode insertion depth and frequency-place mapping.
Başkent D; Shannon RV
J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1405-16. PubMed ID: 15807028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Baskent D; Wang X
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of electrode location and spacing on phoneme recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant.
Fu QJ; Shannon RV
Ear Hear; 1999 Aug; 20(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 10466568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
Zeng FG; Galvin JJ
Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 10037066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Two Place-Based Mapping Procedures on Masked Sentence Recognition as a Function of Electrode Array Angular Insertion Depth and Presence of Acoustic Low-Frequency Information: A Simulation Study.
Dillon MT; Buss E; Johnson AD; Canfarotta MW; O'Connell BP
Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(6):478-487. PubMed ID: 37482054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simulations of tonotopically mapped speech processors for cochlear implant electrodes varying in insertion depth.
Faulkner A; Rosen S; Stanton D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):1073-80. PubMed ID: 12597200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The right information may matter more than frequency-place alignment: simulations of frequency-aligned and upward shifting cochlear implant processors for a shallow electrode array insertion.
Faulkner A; Rosen S; Norman C
Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):139-52. PubMed ID: 16518142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of dynamic range and amplitude mapping on phoneme recognition in Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.
Fu QJ; Shannon RV
Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 10890731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combining acoustic and electrical hearing.
Gantz BJ; Turner CW
Laryngoscope; 2003 Oct; 113(10):1726-30. PubMed ID: 14520097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
Rader T; Döge J; Adel Y; Weissgerber T; Baumann U
Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.
Fu QJ; Shannon RV; Wang X
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3586-96. PubMed ID: 9857517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptually aligning apical frequency regions leads to more binaural fusion of speech in a cochlear implant simulation.
Staisloff HE; Lee DH; Aronoff JM
Hear Res; 2016 Jul; 337():59-64. PubMed ID: 27208791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.
Stohl JS; Throckmorton CS; Collins LM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Holes in hearing.
Shannon RV; Galvin JJ; Baskent D
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2002 Jun; 3(2):185-99. PubMed ID: 12162368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electric to acoustic pitch matching: a possible way to improve individual cochlear implant fitting.
Nardo WD; Cantore I; Marchese MR; Cianfrone F; Scorpecci A; Giannantonio S; Paludetti G
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Nov; 265(11):1321-8. PubMed ID: 18379812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of introducing unprocessed low-frequency information on the reception of envelope-vocoder processed speech.
Qin MK; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2417-26. PubMed ID: 16642854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electro-acoustic stimulation.
Reiss LA; Turner CW; Karsten SA; Gantz BJ
Neuroscience; 2014 Jan; 256():43-52. PubMed ID: 24157931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
