166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12704041)
1. Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging.
Sohaib SA; Sahdev A; Van Trappen P; Jacobs IJ; Reznek RH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 May; 180(5):1297-304. PubMed ID: 12704041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance evaluation of adnexal masses.
Guerra A; Cunha TM; Félix A
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):700-9. PubMed ID: 18568564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging--multivariate analysis.
Hricak H; Chen M; Coakley FV; Kinkel K; Yu KK; Sica G; Bacchetti P; Powell CB
Radiology; 2000 Jan; 214(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 10644099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adnexal masses: accuracy of detection and differentiation with multidetector computed tomography.
Tsili AC; Tsampoulas C; Charisiadi A; Kalef-Ezra J; Dousias V; Paraskevaidis E; Efremidis SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 18486202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Complex renal cysts: findings on MR imaging.
Balci NC; Semelka RC; Patt RH; Dubois D; Freeman JA; Gomez-Caminero A; Woosley JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jun; 172(6):1495-500. PubMed ID: 10350279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.
Low RN; Sigeti JS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1131-40. PubMed ID: 7976889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR imaging of pelvic masses in women: contrast-enhanced vs unenhanced images.
Thurnher SA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Dec; 159(6):1243-50. PubMed ID: 1442393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR imaging evaluation of postmenopausal adnexal masses: correlation with final pathologic diagnosis.
Temma-Asano K; Kimura T; Tsutsui T; Nobunaga T; Samejima Y; Mitsuda N; Kameda T; Ohta Y; Yamamoto T; Saji F; Kamiura S
Maturitas; 2006 Jan; 53(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 16325021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differentiation between malignant and benign ovarian tumors by magnetic resonance imaging.
Chen M; Wang WC; Zhou C; Zhou NN; Cai K; Yang ZH; Zhao WF; Li SY; Li GZ
Chin Med Sci J; 2006 Dec; 21(4):270-5. PubMed ID: 17249204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of adnexal masses using feature analysis at contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography.
Zhang J; Mironov S; Hricak H; Ishill NM; Moskowitz CS; Soslow RA; Chi DS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(4):533-40. PubMed ID: 18664838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Kamitani T; Setoguchi T; Okafuji T; Soeda H; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Tokunaga E; Yamamoto H; Honda H
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e126-32. PubMed ID: 19796900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Major salivary gland lesions: correlation of MR findings with flow cytometric DNA analysis and prognosis.
Takashima S; Sone S; Horii A; Okamoto S; Yoshida J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1297-304. PubMed ID: 8911200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging strategy for early ovarian cancer: characterization of adnexal masses with conventional and advanced imaging techniques.
Mohaghegh P; Rockall AG
Radiographics; 2012 Oct; 32(6):1751-73. PubMed ID: 23065168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses.
Sohaib SA; Mills TD; Sahdev A; Webb JA; Vantrappen PO; Jacobs IJ; Reznek RH
Clin Radiol; 2005 Mar; 60(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 15710137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR imaging of ovarian hemorrhage.
Nishino M; Hayakawa K; Iwasaku K; Togashi K; Ueda H; Sago T; Noguchi M
Eur J Radiol; 2004 Jul; 51(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 15186882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR imaging of renal masses interpreted on CT to be suspicious.
Tello R; Davison BD; O'Malley M; Fenlon H; Thomson KR; Witte DJ; Harewood L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Apr; 174(4):1017-22. PubMed ID: 10749242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast.
Nunes LW; Schnall MD; Siegelman ES; Langlotz CP; Orel SG; Sullivan D; Muenz LA; Reynolds CA; Torosian MH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Aug; 169(2):409-15. PubMed ID: 9242744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can a multiphasic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo sequence be sufficient for liver MR imaging?
Coulam CH; Chan FP; Li KC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Feb; 178(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 11804888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of adrenal masses using MR imaging with histopathologic correlation.
Heinz-Peer G; Hönigschnabl S; Schneider B; Niederle B; Kaserer K; Lechner G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jul; 173(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10397092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
