These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Normal human locomotion. Hughes J; Jacobs N Prosthet Orthot Int; 1979 Apr; 3(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 471705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oscillation and reaction board techniques for estimating inertial properties of a below-knee prosthesis. Smith JD; Ferris AE; Heise GD; Hinrichs RN; Martin PE J Vis Exp; 2014 May; (87):. PubMed ID: 24837164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lower-leg inertial properties in transtibial amputees and control subjects and their influence on the swing phase during gait. Selles RW; Korteland S; Van Soest AJ; Bussmann JB; Stam HJ Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Apr; 84(4):569-77. PubMed ID: 12690597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Knee joint torque during the swing phase of normal treadmill walking. Cavanagh PR; Gregor RJ J Biomech; 1975 Sep; 8(5):337-44. PubMed ID: 1184605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Output space tracking control for above-knee prosthesis. Popović DB; Kalanović VD IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Jun; 40(6):549-57. PubMed ID: 8262536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The development of A/K prosthesis with the knee joint torque generation mechanism adaptable to walking period]. Koganezawa K; Kato I Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1983 Oct; 21(6):445-51. PubMed ID: 6678980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance Evaluation of Jaipur Knee Joint through Kinematics and Kinetics Gait Symmetry with Unilateral Transfemoral Indian Amputees. Mishra P; Singh S; Ranjan V; Singh S; Vidyarthi A J Med Syst; 2019 Jan; 43(3):55. PubMed ID: 30694396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimization of four-bar knee mechanisms--a computerized approach. Hobson DA; Torfason LE J Biomech; 1974 Aug; 7(4):371-6. PubMed ID: 4414932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Contributions to the understanding of gait control. Simonsen EB Dan Med J; 2014 Apr; 61(4):B4823. PubMed ID: 24814597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of transfemoral amputees using a passive microprocessor-controlled knee versus an active powered microprocessor-controlled knee for level walking. Creylman V; Knippels I; Janssen P; Biesbrouck E; Lechler K; Peeraer L Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 3):142. PubMed ID: 28105945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Development of a knee joint simulator (author's transl)]. Stallforth H; Ungethüm M Arch Orthop Unfallchir; 1977 Dec; 90(3):343-53. PubMed ID: 607926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Considerations on the dynamic load line in the stance phase of the walking cycle (author's transl)]. Horvath E Biomed Tech (Berl); 1979 Dec; 24(12):302-8. PubMed ID: 548131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Impulse and moment of impulse in the leg joints by impact from kicking. Lindbeck L J Biomech Eng; 1983 May; 105(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 6865351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the Relative Contributions of Active Ankle and Knee Assistance to the Walking Mechanics of Transfemoral Amputees Using a Powered Prosthesis. Ingraham KA; Fey NP; Simon AM; Hargrove LJ PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0147661. PubMed ID: 26807889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved dynamic model of the human knee joint and its response to impact loading on the lower leg. Engin AE; Tümer ST J Biomech Eng; 1993 May; 115(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 8326719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Biomechanical analysis of locomotion patterns in the lower limb. II. Forces in joints]. Gruber K; Legal H; Ruder H Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1983; 121(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 6858319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Control mechanism performance criteria for an above-knee leg prosthesis. Wallach J; Saibel E J Biomech; 1970 Jan; 3(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 5521534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]