BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12704617)

  • 1. On weighting the rates in non-response weights.
    Little RJ; Vartivarian S
    Stat Med; 2003 May; 22(9):1589-99. PubMed ID: 12704617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On modelling response propensity for dwelling unit (DU) level non-response adjustment in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).
    Wun LM; Ezzati-Rice TM; Diaz-Tena N; Greenblatt J
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(8):1875-84. PubMed ID: 17206601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An application of a weighting method to adjust for nonresponse in standardized incidence ratio analysis of cohort studies.
    Rao RS; Sigurdson AJ; Doody MM; Graubard BI
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 15(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 15652718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The design of multi-stage tuberculin surveys: some suggestions for sampling.
    Nagelkerke NJ; Borgdorff MW; Kalisvaart NA; Broekmans JF
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2000 Apr; 4(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 10777079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Handling nonresponse in surveys: analytic corrections compared with converting nonresponders.
    Jenkins P; Earle-Richardson G; Burdick P; May J
    Am J Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 167(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 17998277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Population coverage and nonresponse bias in a large-scale human exposure study.
    Mosquin P; Whitmore R; Suerken C; Quackenboss J
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 15(5):431-8. PubMed ID: 15674317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle 6: sample design, weighting, imputation, and variance estimation.
    Lepkowski JM; Mosher WD; Davis KE; Groves RM; van Hoewyk J; Willem J
    Vital Health Stat 2; 2006 Jul; (142):1-82. PubMed ID: 16999003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian analysis of a proportion under non-ignorable non-response.
    Nandram B; Choi JW
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1189-212. PubMed ID: 12111874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Normand SL; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):754-68. PubMed ID: 16783757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adjustments for non-telephone bias in random-digit-dialling surveys.
    Frankel MR; Srinath KP; Hoaglin DC; Battaglia MP; Smith PJ; Wright RA; Khare M
    Stat Med; 2003 May; 22(9):1611-26. PubMed ID: 12704619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The proportionator: unbiased stereological estimation using biased automatic image analysis and non-uniform probability proportional to size sampling.
    Gardi JE; Nyengaard JR; Gundersen HJ
    Comput Biol Med; 2008 Mar; 38(3):313-28. PubMed ID: 18163985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simplified general method for cluster-sample surveys of health in developing countries.
    Bennett S; Woods T; Liyanage WM; Smith DL
    World Health Stat Q; 1991; 44(3):98-106. PubMed ID: 1949887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Estimation methods in a sampling survey].
    Warszawski J; Lellouch J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1997 Apr; 45(2):150-68. PubMed ID: 9221444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The design, errors and costs of a local adult oral health survey.
    Simmons SR; Edger TM
    Community Dent Health; 1999 Dec; 16(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 10665172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implementation and applications of bootstrap methods for the National Immunization Survey.
    Smith PJ; Hoaglin DC; Battaglia MP; Barker L
    Stat Med; 2003 Aug; 22(15):2487-502. PubMed ID: 12872304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.
    Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive sampling in behavioral surveys.
    Thompson SK
    NIDA Res Monogr; 1997; 167():296-319. PubMed ID: 9243567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Compensating for provider nonresponse using response propensities to form adjustment cells: the National Immunization Survey.
    Smith PJ; Rao JN; Battaglia MP; Ezzati-Rice TM; Daniels D; Khare M;
    Vital Health Stat 2; 2001 Oct; (133):1-17. PubMed ID: 15791761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monitoring low birth weight: an evaluation of international estimates and an updated estimation procedure.
    Blanc AK; Wardlaw T
    Bull World Health Organ; 2005 Mar; 83(3):178-85. PubMed ID: 15798841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ratio estimates, the delta method, and quantal response tests for increased carcinogenicity.
    Bieler GS; Williams RL
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):793-801. PubMed ID: 8241374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.