These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12705110)

  • 21. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
    Adam D; Knight J
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network.
    Simera I; Moher D; Hirst A; Hoey J; Schulz KF; Altman DG
    BMC Med; 2010 Apr; 8():24. PubMed ID: 20420659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
    Newton DP
    Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Structure and format of peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts.
    Manske PR
    J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 31(7):1051-5. PubMed ID: 16945702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [More stringent requirements concerning manuscripts. Declarations of potential connections and conflicts of interest published in the Lakartidningen].
    Milerad J; Ahlberg J; Eliasson M; Fridén B; Håkansson A; Sundberg CJ; Agren H; Ostergren J
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Apr; 99(15):1662-3. PubMed ID: 12025190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three cheers for peers.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Peer review in action: the contribution of referees to advancing reliable knowledge.
    Hanks G
    Palliat Med; 2005 Jul; 19(5):359-70. PubMed ID: 16111059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The politics of publication.
    Lawrence PA
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Expanding access to published research: open access and self-archiving.
    Mower A; Youngkin ME
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 18347463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Peer review should continue after publication.
    Liesegang TJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Mar; 149(3):359-60. PubMed ID: 20172061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Publishing: A helping hand.
    Kaplan K
    Nature; 2010 Dec; 468(7324):721-3. PubMed ID: 21210551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Peer review of manuscripts.
    Ludbrook J
    J Clin Neurosci; 2002 Mar; 9(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 11922694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Open access mandate threatens dissemination of scientific information.
    McMullan E
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 18347464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. To publish or perish: how to review a manuscript.
    Winck JC; Fonseca JA; Azevedo LF; Wedzicha JA
    Rev Port Pneumol; 2011; 17(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 21477574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Peer review: issues in physical medicine and rehabilitation.
    Wagner AK; Boninger ML; Levy C; Chan L; Gater D; Kirby RL
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10):790-802. PubMed ID: 14508411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Peer review and appeal: flawed but trusted?
    Pravinkumar E
    Lancet; 2003 Aug; 362(9385):747. PubMed ID: 12957106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of attendance at a training session on peer reviewer quality and performance.
    Callaham ML; Wears RL; Waeckerle JF
    Ann Emerg Med; 1998 Sep; 32(3 Pt 1):318-22. PubMed ID: 9737493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Making an impact.
    Wu R
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6979):206-7. PubMed ID: 15014507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Online survey of nursing journal peer reviewers: indicators of quality in manuscripts.
    Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH; Baggs JG; Broome M
    West J Nurs Res; 2011 Jun; 33(4):506-21. PubMed ID: 21078915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reviewing in science requires quality criteria and professional reviewers.
    Jurkat-Rott K; Lehmann-Horn F
    Eur J Cell Biol; 2004 Apr; 83(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 15202567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.