These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12705253)

  • 1. Do not discourage the use of P values.
    Compton S
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):584. PubMed ID: 12705253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Upgrading our instructions for authors.
    Schriger DL; Wears RL; Cooper RJ; Callaham ML
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Apr; 41(4):565-7. PubMed ID: 12658258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to review a paper for Heart.
    Otto CM
    Heart; 2015 Jan; 101(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 25502328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do it right the first time: advice for cornea authors.
    Sugar A; Sugar J; Schwab I; Perry H; de Luise V; Soong HK; Weiss J
    Cornea; 2014 Sep; 33(9):879. PubMed ID: 25062337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: A comprehensive guide for peer reviewers.
    Brown LM; David EA; Karamlou T; Nason KS
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Jun; 153(6):1609-1614. PubMed ID: 28526112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of editors, reviewers and authors in improving the journal quality.
    Bugiardini R
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2011 Jan; 12(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21263233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. So, You Want to Improve Your Plastic Surgery Papers? Introducing PRS' Friendly EQUATOR Reporting Guidelines.
    Rohrich RJ; Weinstein A
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Jul; 136(1):205-208. PubMed ID: 25829154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientific record: Class uncorrected errors as misconduct.
    Kamoun S; Zipfel C
    Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7593):173. PubMed ID: 26961649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review.
    Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A
    Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer Review - Essential for Article and Journal Scientific Assessment and Validity.
    Masic I
    Med Arch; 2016 Jun; 70(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 27594739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors.
    Allison DB; Brown AW; George BJ; Kaiser KA
    Nature; 2016 Feb; 530(7588):27-9. PubMed ID: 26842041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Translation of the scientific method... Peer review.
    Scarfe WC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Apr; 109(4):485-7. PubMed ID: 20176497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A call for the reporting of effect sizes in research reports to enhance critical appraisal and evidence-based practice.
    Mays MZ; Melnyk BM
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2009; 6(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 19744052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fortifying the external peer review: an editorial perspective.
    Sohail S
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Jan; 25(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 25604359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The ATS Journals' policy on image manipulation.
    Abraham E; Adler KB; Shapiro SD; Leff AR
    Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol; 2008 Nov; 39(5):499. PubMed ID: 18927351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peering into peer review.
    Nat Microbiol; 2019 Jul; 4(7):1065. PubMed ID: 31222174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of published articles in CAJM.
    Nystrom L
    Cent Afr J Med; 1998 Oct; 44(10):264-5. PubMed ID: 10101438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer Review Process, Editorial Decisions, and Manuscript Resubmission: A Reference for Novice Researchers.
    Lusher AD
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2015 Sep; 115(9):566-9. PubMed ID: 26322935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review and the nursing literature.
    Dougherty MC
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review: should we modify our process?
    Berquist TH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):463-4. PubMed ID: 24555581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.