These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12705305)
1. Comparison of non-linear finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on a Morse taper implant. Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K; Cehreli MC; Sahin S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 12705305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of three-dimensional finite element stress analysis with in vitro strain gauge measurements on dental implants. Akça K; Cehreli MC; Iplikçioglu H Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 11951799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Force transmission of one- and two-piece morse-taper oral implants: a nonlinear finite element analysis. Cehreli MC; Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 15248884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonlinear finite element analysis versus ex vivo strain gauge measurements on immediately loaded implants. Eser A; Akça K; Eckert S; Cehreli MC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 19587865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The dynamic natures of implant loading. Wang RF; Kang B; Lang LA; Razzoog ME J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):359-71. PubMed ID: 19463663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of superstructure materials on strain around an implant under 2 loading conditions: a technical investigation. Stegaroiu R; Khraisat A; Nomura S; Miyakawa O Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):735-42. PubMed ID: 15508991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical aspects of bone-level diameter shifting at implant-abutment interface. Canay S; Akça K Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 19509534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis of interface force transmission of internal-cone implants. Akça K; Cehreli MC Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Aug; 28(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 18717378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading. Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis. Chun HJ; Shin HS; Han CH; Lee SH Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 16634489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro strain gauge analysis of axial and off-axial loading on implant supported fixed partial dentures. Cehreli MC; Iplikçioglu H Implant Dent; 2002; 11(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 12271568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone. Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of dental implant cross-sectional design on cortical bone structure using finite element analysis. Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; El-Maaytah M Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 18031443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants: considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Kitamura E; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):401-12. PubMed ID: 15248874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Stegaroiu R; Kusakari H; Nishiyama S; Miyakawa O Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 9857588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis. Schrotenboer J; Tsao YP; Kinariwala V; Wang HL Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19509536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis. Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical optimization of implant diameter and length for immediate loading: a nonlinear finite element analysis. Kong L; Gu Z; Li T; Wu J; Hu K; Liu Y; Zhou H; Liu B Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 19918598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]