These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1270593)

  • 1. Evaluation of the API 20 c microtube system for the identification of clinically important yeasts.
    Roberts GD; Wang HS; Hollick GE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Mar; 3(3):302-5. PubMed ID: 1270593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the modified API 20C system for identification of clinically important yeasts.
    Buesching WJ; Kurek K; Roberts GD
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 May; 9(5):565-69. PubMed ID: 383742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a modified dye pour-plate auxanographic method for the rapid identification of clinically significant yeasts. Comparison with two commercial systems.
    Weymann LH; Stager CE; Qadri SG; Villarreal A; Qadri SM
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1979 Mar; 167(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 375051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the API 20C for identification of yeasts.
    Zwadyk P; Tarlton RA; Proctor A
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1977 Mar; 67(3):269-71. PubMed ID: 842501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of common commercial systems for the identification of yeast isolates in microbiology laboratories: a multicenter study].
    Karabıçak N; Uludağ Altun H; Karatuna O; Hazırolan G; Aksu N; Adiloğlu A; Akyar I
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2015 Apr; 49(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 26167821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy of API 20C and ID 32C systems for identification of common and rare clinical yeast isolates.
    Ramani R; Gromadzki S; Pincus DH; Salkin IF; Chaturvedi V
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3396-8. PubMed ID: 9774605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the new API Candida system to the ID 32C system for identification of clinically important yeast species.
    Fricker-Hidalgo H; Vandapel O; Duchesne MA; Mazoyer MA; Monget D; Lardy B; Lebeau B; Freney J; Ambroise-Thomas P; Grillot R
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jul; 34(7):1846-8. PubMed ID: 8784609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of commercial systems for the identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Bowman PI; Ahearn DG
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Jul; 4(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 956362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid methods for identification of yeasts.
    Huppert M; Harper G; Sun SH; Delanerolle V
    J Clin Microbiol; 1975 Jul; 2(1):21-34. PubMed ID: 1241586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of three commercial systems for identification of yeasts commonly isolated in the clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Wadlin JK; Hanko G; Stewart R; Pape J; Nachamkin I
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jun; 37(6):1967-70. PubMed ID: 10325356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differentiation of yeast-like fungi using the commercial Auxacolor system.
    Hantschke D
    Mycoses; 1996; 39(3-4):135-40. PubMed ID: 8767008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of clinical yeasts by Vitek MS system compared with API ID 32 C.
    Durán-Valle MT; Sanz-Rodríguez N; Muñoz-Paraíso C; Almagro-Moltó M; Gómez-Garcés JL
    Med Mycol; 2014 May; 52(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 24782106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system, a new method of clinical yeast identification.
    Davey KG; Chant PM; Downer CS; Campbell CK; Warnock DW
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Sep; 48(9):807-9. PubMed ID: 7490311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tube carbohydrate assimilation method for the rapid indentification of clinically significant yeasts.
    Qadri SM; Nichols CW
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1978 May; 165(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 351362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a new system for the rapid identification of clinically important yeasts.
    Segal E; Ajello L
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Aug; 4(2):157-9. PubMed ID: 965478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Automated method for yeast identification: ATB 32 C].
    Hernández-Molina JM; Coque MT; Campos E; Rando C; Leiva EF
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1992 May; 10(5):293-5. PubMed ID: 1391001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experience with the MicroSeq D2 large-subunit ribosomal DNA sequencing kit for identification of commonly encountered, clinically important yeast species.
    Hall L; Wohlfiel S; Roberts GD
    J Clin Microbiol; 2003 Nov; 41(11):5099-102. PubMed ID: 14605145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Uni-Yeast-Tek kit for the identification of medically important yeasts.
    Bowman PI; Ahearn DG
    J Clin Microbiol; 1975 Oct; 2(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 1102563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A cost-effective carbohydrate fermentation test for yeast using microtitre plate.
    Kali A; Srirangaraj S; Charles PM
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2015; 33(2):293-5. PubMed ID: 25865987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laboratory identification and sensitivity testing of yeast isolates.
    Sandven P
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Feb; 48(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 1690944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.