These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1270593)

  • 21. Comparison of four commercialized biochemical systems for clinical yeast identification by colour-producing reactions.
    Paugam A; Benchetrit M; Fiacre A; Tourte-Schaefer C; Dupouy-Camet J
    Med Mycol; 1999 Feb; 37(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 10200929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A convenient microtitre tray procedure for yeast identification.
    Heard GM; Fleet GH
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1990 May; 68(5):447-51. PubMed ID: 2370232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Evaluation of the API 20 C system for the rapid identification of yeast-like organisms].
    Casal M; Linares MJ
    Rev Latinoam Microbiol; 1984; 26(1):77-80. PubMed ID: 6385177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of two commercialized systems for the rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
    Quindós G; Lipperheide V; Pontón J
    Mycoses; 1993; 36(9-10):299-303. PubMed ID: 8015561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the AUXACOLOR system for the identification of clinical yeast isolates.
    Milan EP; Malheiros ES; Fischman O; Colombo AL
    Mycopathologia; 1997; 137(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 9368409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluation of six commercial systems for identification of medically important yeasts.
    Buchaille L; Freydière AM; Guinet R; Gille Y
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Jul; 17(7):479-88. PubMed ID: 9764550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Yeast Biochemical Card for rapid identification of medically important yeasts.
    Oblack DL; Rhodes JC; Martin WJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Feb; 13(2):351-5. PubMed ID: 7009641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.
    Fenn JP; Segal H; Barland B; Denton D; Whisenant J; Chun H; Christofferson K; Hamilton L; Carroll K
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 May; 32(5):1184-7. PubMed ID: 8051243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of Abbott Quantum II yeast identification system.
    Salkin IF; Schadow KH; Bankaitis LA; McGinnis MR; Kemna ME
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Sep; 22(3):442-4. PubMed ID: 3900130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Identification of clinical yeast isolates by using the Microring YT.
    McGowan KL; Mortensen JE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Feb; 31(2):185-7. PubMed ID: 8432801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of four commercial biochemical test systems for identification of yeasts.
    Bergan T; Hollum AB; Vangdal M
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 1(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 6756911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Evaluation of mass spectrometry for the identification of clinically interesting yeasts].
    Galán F; García-Agudo L; Guerrero I; Marín P; García-Tapia A; García-Martos P; Rodríguez-Iglesias M
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2015; 33(6):372-8. PubMed ID: 25444360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of simplified and commercial systems for identification of foodborne yeasts.
    Deák T; Beuchat LR
    Int J Food Microbiol; 1988 Oct; 7(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 3079471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the new API 20C strip for yeast identification against a conventional method.
    Land GA; Harrison BA; Hulme KL; Cooper BH; Byrd JC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Sep; 10(3):357-64. PubMed ID: 385621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ability of RapID Yeast Plus System to identify 304 clinically significant yeasts within 5 hours.
    Kitch TT; Jacobs MR; McGinnis MR; Appelbaum PC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 May; 34(5):1069-71. PubMed ID: 8727877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of use of phenotypic and genotypic characteristics for identification of species of the anamorph genus Candida and related teleomorph yeast species.
    Latouche GN; Daniel HM; Lee OC; Mitchell TG; Sorrell TC; Meyer W
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3171-80. PubMed ID: 9399515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improved auxanographic method for yeast assimilations: a comparison with other approaches.
    Land GA; Vinton EC; Adcock GB; Hopkins JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1975 Sep; 2(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 1176628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A simplified routine method for determining carbohydrate fermentation by yeasts.
    Cazin J
    Mycopathol Mycol Appl; 1969 May; 37(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 5797619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of four commercial systems for identification of medically important yeasts.
    Schuffenecker I; Freydière A; de Montclos H; Gille Y
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1993 Apr; 12(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 8513813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of the Quantum II yeast identification system.
    Kiehn TE; Edwards FF; Tom D; Lieberman G; Bernard EM; Armstrong D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Aug; 22(2):216-9. PubMed ID: 3897264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.