These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12705987)
1. Radical prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation: impact of a positive margin. Bianco FJ; Grignon DJ; Sakr WA; Shekarriz B; Upadhyay J; Dornelles E; Pontes JE Eur Urol; 2003 May; 43(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 12705987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The significance of a positive bladder neck margin after radical prostatectomy: the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Stage T4 designation is not warranted. Pierorazio PM; Epstein JI; Humphreys E; Han M; Walsh PC; Partin AW J Urol; 2010 Jan; 183(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 19914651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Positive surgical margins with radical retropubic prostatectomy: anatomic site-specific pathologic analysis and impact on prognosis. Obek C; Sadek S; Lai S; Civantos F; Rubinowicz D; Soloway MS Urology; 1999 Oct; 54(4):682-8. PubMed ID: 10510928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is a positive bladder neck margin truly a T4 lesion in the prostate specific antigen era? Results from the SEARCH Database. Buschemeyer WC; Hamilton RJ; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ J Urol; 2008 Jan; 179(1):124-9; discussion 129. PubMed ID: 17997433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Update on bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact on pathologic outcome, anastomotic strictures, and continence. Shelfo SW; Obek C; Soloway MS Urology; 1998 Jan; 51(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 9457292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence. O'Neil LM; Walsh S; Cohen RJ; Lee S BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():42-8. PubMed ID: 26218868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of bladder neck preservation during radical prostatectomy on continence and cancer control. Licht MR; Klein EA; Tuason L; Levin H Urology; 1994 Dec; 44(6):883-7. PubMed ID: 7527169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bladder neck involvement in pathological stage pT4 radical prostatectomy specimens is not an independent prognostic factor. Yossepowitch O; Sircar K; Scardino PT; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler TM; Reuter VE J Urol; 2002 Nov; 168(5):2011-5. PubMed ID: 12394697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients. Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report. Li K; Li H; Yang Y; Ian LH; Pun WH; Ho SF Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic differences among the positive surgical margin locations following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a large Japanese cohort (the MSUG94 group). Sasaki T; Ebara S; Tatenuma T; Ikehata Y; Nakayama A; Kawase M; Toide M; Yoneda T; Sakaguchi K; Teishima J; Makiyama K; Kitamura H; Saito K; Koie T; Koga F; Urakami S; Inoue T Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2023 Apr; 53(5):443-451. PubMed ID: 36708227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the impact of apical dissection, bladder neck remodeling and nerve preservation. Katz R; Salomon L; Hoznek A; de la Taille A; Antiphon P; Abbou CC J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2049-52. PubMed ID: 12771716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy. Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Bergstralh EJ; Slezak JM; Martin SK; Amling CL; Zincke H Urology; 1997 Nov; 50(5):733-9. PubMed ID: 9372884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis. Ellis CL; Partin AW; Han M; Epstein JI J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2068-73. PubMed ID: 23727307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: importance of intra-operative bladder neck frozen sections. Nakamura K; Kasraeian A; Anai S; Pendleton J; Rosser CJ Int Braz J Urol; 2007; 33(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 18199342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome. De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The bladder neck preservation in robot assisted radical prostatectomy: Surgical and pathological outcome. Zazzara M; Gardiman MP; Dal Moro F Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2023 Dec; 95(4):12138. PubMed ID: 38193218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy. Kupelian PA; Katcher J; Levin HS; Klein EA Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(5):1043-52. PubMed ID: 9169811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]