These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12706221)

  • 1. Spatial scale contribution to early visual differences between face and object processing.
    Goffaux V; Gauthier I; Rossion B
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 May; 16(3):416-24. PubMed ID: 12706221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex.
    Rossion B; Joyce CA; Cottrell GW; Tarr MJ
    Neuroimage; 2003 Nov; 20(3):1609-24. PubMed ID: 14642472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Category-sensitivity in the N170 range: a question of topography and inversion, not one of amplitude.
    Boehm SG; Dering B; Thierry G
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):2082-9. PubMed ID: 21477606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Misaligning face halves increases and delays the N170 specifically for upright faces: implications for the nature of early face representations.
    Jacques C; Rossion B
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1318():96-109. PubMed ID: 20051235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological correlates of facial decision: insights from upright and upside-down Mooney-face perception.
    George N; Jemel B; Fiori N; Chaby L; Renault B
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 15890502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain.
    Rossion B; Gauthier I; Tarr MJ; Despland P; Bruyer R; Linotte S; Crommelinck M
    Neuroreport; 2000 Jan; 11(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 10683832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ERP evidence for the speed of face categorization in the human brain: Disentangling the contribution of low-level visual cues from face perception.
    Rossion B; Caharel S
    Vision Res; 2011 Jun; 51(12):1297-311. PubMed ID: 21549144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early holistic face-like processing of Arcimboldo paintings in the right occipito-temporal cortex: evidence from the N170 ERP component.
    Caharel S; Leleu A; Bernard C; Viggiano MP; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Nov; 90(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 23816562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neural adaptation provides evidence for categorical differences in processing of faces and Chinese characters: an ERP study of the N170.
    Fu S; Feng C; Guo S; Luo Y; Parasuraman R
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e41103. PubMed ID: 22911750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Face, eye and object early processing: what is the face specificity?
    Itier RJ; Latinus M; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jan; 29(2):667-76. PubMed ID: 16169749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of facial color and inversion on the N170 event-related potential (ERP) component.
    Minami T; Nakajima K; Changvisommid L; Nakauchi S
    Neuroscience; 2015 Dec; 311():341-8. PubMed ID: 26477984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined effects of inversion and feature removal on N170 responses elicited by faces and car fronts.
    Kloth N; Itier RJ; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Apr; 81(3):321-8. PubMed ID: 23485023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early ERP components differentially extract facial features: evidence for spatial frequency-and-contrast detectors.
    Nakashima T; Kaneko K; Goto Y; Abe T; Mitsudo T; Ogata K; Makinouchi A; Tobimatsu S
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Dec; 62(4):225-35. PubMed ID: 18809442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parametric study of EEG sensitivity to phase noise during face processing.
    Rousselet GA; Pernet CR; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    BMC Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 9():98. PubMed ID: 18834518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why is the N170 enhanced for inverted faces? An ERP competition experiment.
    Sadeh B; Yovel G
    Neuroimage; 2010 Nov; 53(2):782-9. PubMed ID: 20558303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From upright to upside-down presentation: a spatio-temporal ERP study of the parametric effect of rotation on face and house processing.
    Jemel B; Coutya J; Langer C; Roy S
    BMC Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 10():100. PubMed ID: 19691846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The N170, not the P1, indexes the earliest time for categorical perception of faces, regardless of interstimulus variance.
    Ganis G; Smith D; Schendan HE
    Neuroimage; 2012 Sep; 62(3):1563-74. PubMed ID: 22634853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170.
    Rossion B; Jacques C
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):1959-79. PubMed ID: 18055223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial attention modulates early face processing.
    Feng W; Martinez A; Pitts M; Luo YJ; Hillyard SA
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3461-8. PubMed ID: 23017595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structural encoding of human and schematic faces: holistic and part-based processes.
    Sagiv N; Bentin S
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 13(7):937-51. PubMed ID: 11595097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.