These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12708420)
1. Reproductive technologies and our attitudes towards children. Davis NA Logos (Santa Clara); 1988; 9():51-77. PubMed ID: 12708420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. What are families for? Getting to an ethics of reproductive technology. Murray TH Hastings Cent Rep; 2002; 32(3):41-5. PubMed ID: 12085515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identity, harm, and the ethics of reproductive technology. Malek J J Med Philos; 2006 Feb; 31(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 16464771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical study: aspiring parents, genotypes and phenotypes: the unexamined myth of the perfect baby. Banger E; McGee G Albany Law Rev; 2005; 68(4):1097-111. PubMed ID: 16094768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Meeting the needs of children of assisted conception. Jaeger AS Am J Fam Law; 2000; 14(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 12449981 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Age and assisted reproduction. Pennings G Int J Med Law; 1995; 14(7-8):531-41. PubMed ID: 12083146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Getting beyond the welfare of the child in assisted reproduction. Solberg B J Med Ethics; 2009 Jun; 35(6):373-6. PubMed ID: 19482982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Summary of Saviour Siblings. Taylor-Sands M J Med Ethics; 2015 Dec; 41(12):926. PubMed ID: 25660161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproductive ethics and the family. Nelson JL N Z Bioeth J; 2000 Jun; 1(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 15586970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Assisted reproduction--biology and ethics]. Hofmann B; Moldestad O Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2012 Apr; 132(7):856-9. PubMed ID: 22511107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 13: the welfare of the child in medically assisted reproduction. ; Pennings G; de Wert G; Shenfield F; Cohen J; Tarlatzis B; Devroey P Hum Reprod; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2585-8. PubMed ID: 17728354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences and similarities in the attitudes of paediatricians, gynaecologists and experienced parents to criteria delineating potential risks for the welfare of children to be conceived with assisted reproduction. De Geyter C; Boehler B; Reiter-Theil S Swiss Med Wkly; 2010; 140():w13064. PubMed ID: 20652848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The parental investment factor and the child's right to an open future. Davis DS Hastings Cent Rep; 2009; 39(2):24-7. PubMed ID: 19388382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Harming future persons: obligations to the children of reproductive technology. Peters PG South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 1999; 8(2):375-400. PubMed ID: 12778916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Spectacular reproduction: Ron's Angels and mechanical reproduction in the age of ART (assisted reproductive technology). Hafstein VT J Med Humanit; 2007 Mar; 28(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 17136463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproductive cloning combined with genetic modification. Strong C J Med Ethics; 2005 Nov; 31(11):654-8. PubMed ID: 16269564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Parents and children: "surrogate" paradigm of modernity. Adam A; Akhaladze V Georgian Med News; 2011 Jun; (195):7-10. PubMed ID: 21778532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use or refuse reproductive genetic technologies: which would a 'good parent' do? Malek J Bioethics; 2013 Feb; 27(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 21726259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]