BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

572 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12709858)

  • 1. Clinical and psychofunctional measures of conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study.
    Gunzburg R; Keller TS; Szpalski M; Vandeputte K; Spratt KF
    Eur Spine J; 2003 Apr; 12(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 12709858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A predictive model for outcome after conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Spratt KF; Keller TS; Szpalski M; Vandeputte K; Gunzburg R
    Eur Spine J; 2004 Feb; 13(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 14658061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].
    Hrabálek L; Machác J; Vaverka M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 19912707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Outcomes after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison between minimally invasive unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression and open laminectomy: clinical article.
    Mobbs RJ; Li J; Sivabalan P; Raley D; Rao PJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 24878273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosis-associated radiculopathy.
    Parker SL; Fulchiero EC; Davis BJ; Adogwa O; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):705-11. PubMed ID: 21641874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term results of percutaneous lumbar decompression mild(®) for spinal stenosis.
    Mekhail N; Vallejo R; Coleman MH; Benyamin RM
    Pain Pract; 2012 Mar; 12(3):184-93. PubMed ID: 21676166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of duration of symptoms on standard outcome measures in the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis.
    Ng LC; Tafazal S; Sell P
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Feb; 16(2):199-206. PubMed ID: 16496190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis.
    Elowitz EH; Yanni DS; Chwajol M; Starke RM; Perin NI
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2011 Oct; 54(5-6):201-6. PubMed ID: 22278781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Cavuşoğlu H; Türkmenoğlu O; Kaya RA; Tuncer C; Colak I; Sahin Y; Aydin Y
    Turk Neurosurg; 2007 Apr; 17(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 17935024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
    den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial.
    Malmivaara A; Slätis P; Heliövaara M; Sainio P; Kinnunen H; Kankare J; Dalin-Hirvonen N; Seitsalo S; Herno A; Kortekangas P; Niinimäki T; Rönty H; Tallroth K; Turunen V; Knekt P; Härkänen T; Hurri H;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17202885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preoperative Zung depression scale predicts patient satisfaction independent of the extent of improvement after revision lumbar surgery.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Bydon A; Cheng JS; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 23422730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective analysis of surgical outcomes in patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy and posterior instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Gelalis ID; Arnaoutoglou C; Christoforou G; Lykissas MG; Batsilas I; Xenakis T
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2010; 44(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 21088465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stability-preserving decompression in degenerative versus congenital spinal stenosis: demographic patterns and patient outcomes.
    Louie PK; Paul JC; Markowitz J; Bell JA; Basques BA; Yacob A; An HS
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1420-1425. PubMed ID: 28456675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of depression symptoms on patient expectations and clinical outcomes in the surgical management of spinal stenosis.
    Urban-Baeza A; Zárate-Kalfópulos B; Romero-Vargas S; Obil-Chavarría C; Brenes-Rojas L; Reyes-Sánchez A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 25380536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Midterm outcome after microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: 4-year prospective study.
    Castro-Menéndez M; Bravo-Ricoy JA; Casal-Moro R; Hernández-Blanco M; Jorge-Barreiro FJ
    Neurosurgery; 2009 Jul; 65(1):100-10; discussion 110; quiz A12. PubMed ID: 19574831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.