These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12710220)

  • 1. The conjunction effect: new evidence for robustness.
    Stolarz-Fantino S; Fantino E; Zizzo DJ; Wen J
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 12710220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Source reliability and the conjunction fallacy.
    Jarvstad A; Hahn U
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(4):682-711. PubMed ID: 21564268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to explain receptivity to conjunction-fallacy inhibition training: evidence from the Iowa gambling task.
    Cassotti M; Moutier S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 20015585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: probability versus inductive confirmation.
    Tentori K; Crupi V; Russo S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Feb; 142(1):235-255. PubMed ID: 22823498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The conjunction fallacy, confirmation, and quantum theory: comment on Tentori, Crupi, and Russo (2013).
    Busemeyer JR; Wang Z; Pothos EM; Trueblood JS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Feb; 144(1):236-43. PubMed ID: 25621376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Broken Physics: A Conjunction-Fallacy Effect in Intuitive Physical Reasoning.
    Ludwin-Peery E; Bramley NR; Davis E; Gureckis TM
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Dec; 31(12):1602-1611. PubMed ID: 33137265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An electrophysiological monetary incentive delay (e-MID) task: a way to decompose the different components of neural response to positive and negative monetary reinforcement.
    Broyd SJ; Richards HJ; Helps SK; Chronaki G; Bamford S; Sonuga-Barke EJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Jul; 209(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 22659003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing boundary conditions for the conjunction fallacy: effects of response mode, conceptual focus, and problem type.
    Wedell DH; Moro R
    Cognition; 2008 Apr; 107(1):105-36. PubMed ID: 17927971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The rewarding value of good motor performance in the context of monetary incentives.
    Lutz K; Pedroni A; Nadig K; Luechinger R; Jäncke L
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(8):1739-47. PubMed ID: 22569215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of incentivization on the conjunction fallacy in judgments: a meta-analysis.
    Yechiam E; Zeif D
    Psychol Res; 2023 Nov; 87(8):2336-2344. PubMed ID: 37231120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The conjunction fallacy and the many meanings of and.
    Hertwig R; Benz B; Krauss S
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):740-53. PubMed ID: 18723167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The conjunction fallacy?
    Wolford G; Taylor HA; Beck JR
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 2314227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The conjunction fallacy in rats.
    González VV; Sadeghi S; Tran L; Blaisdell AP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Aug; 30(4):1564-1574. PubMed ID: 36795245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian reasoning with ifs and ands and ors.
    Cruz N; Baratgin J; Oaksford M; Over DE
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():192. PubMed ID: 25762965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probability error in diagnosis: the conjunction fallacy among beginning medical students.
    Rao G
    Fam Med; 2009 Apr; 41(4):262-5. PubMed ID: 19343556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perspectives on Correctness in Probabilistic Inference from Psychology.
    Pothos EM; Basieva I; Khrennikov A; Yearsley JM
    Span J Psychol; 2019 Dec; 22():E55. PubMed ID: 31868162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Double Conjunction Fallacies in Physicians' Probability Judgment.
    Crupi V; Elia F; Aprà F; Tentori K
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):756-760. PubMed ID: 29978726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generating and evaluating options for decision making: the impact of sequentially presented evidence.
    Sprenger A; Dougherty MR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):550-75. PubMed ID: 22082233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rewarding performance feedback alters reported time of action.
    Isham EA; Geng JJ
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Dec; 20(4):1577-85. PubMed ID: 21875817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the reality of the conjunction fallacy.
    Sides A; Osherson D; Bonini N; Viale R
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Mar; 30(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 12035881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.