These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12710220)

  • 21. [The framing effect: medical implications].
    Mazzocco K; Cherubini P; Rumiati R
    Ann Ital Med Int; 2005; 20(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15859389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Typicality and reasoning fallacies.
    Shafir EB; Smith EE; Osherson DN
    Mem Cognit; 1990 May; 18(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 2355854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Probability judgments of agency: rational or irrational?
    Schmidt T; Heumüller VC
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 20122851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Conjunction and Disjunction Fallacies: Explanations of the Linda Problem by the Equate-to-Differentiate Model.
    Lu Y
    Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2016 Sep; 50(3):507-31. PubMed ID: 26077336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Framing effect debiasing in medical decision making.
    Almashat S; Ayotte B; Edelstein B; Margrett J
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Apr; 71(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 18164168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Framing effects and risk-sensitive decision making.
    Mishra S; Gregson M; Lalumière ML
    Br J Psychol; 2012 Feb; 103(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 22229776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
    Groenvold M
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neurocognitive processes underlying heuristic and normative probability judgments.
    Andersson L; Eriksson J; Stillesjö S; Juslin P; Nyberg L; Wirebring LK
    Cognition; 2020 Mar; 196():104153. PubMed ID: 31838247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neural representation of reward probability: evidence from the illusion of control.
    Kool W; Getz SJ; Botvinick MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Jun; 25(6):852-61. PubMed ID: 23410034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of ventromedial prefrontal cortex in decision making: judgment under uncertainty or judgment per se?
    Fellows LK; Farah MJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Nov; 17(11):2669-74. PubMed ID: 17259643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Linda is not a bearded lady: configural weighting and adding as the cause of extension errors.
    Nilsson H; Winman A; Juslin P; Hansson G
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):517-34. PubMed ID: 19883134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of contextual factors on the judgement of informal reasoning fallacies.
    Neuman Y; Weinstock MP; Glasner A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Feb; 59(2):411-25. PubMed ID: 16618643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An associative framework for probability judgment: an application to biases.
    Cobos PL; Almaraz J; García-Madruga JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jan; 29(1):80-96. PubMed ID: 12549585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Many-valued logic and event-related potentials.
    Pollina DA; Squires NK
    Brain Lang; 1998 Jul; 63(3):321-45. PubMed ID: 9672763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Parallel Interactive Processing as a Way to Understand Complex Information Processing: The Conjunction Fallacy and Other Examples.
    Nahinsky ID
    Am J Psychol; 2017 Summer; 130(2):201-222. PubMed ID: 29461716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of training, education, professional experience, and need for cognition on accuracy of exposure assessment decision-making.
    Vadali M; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Apr; 56(3):292-304. PubMed ID: 22186374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Causal reasoning and inference making in judging the importance of story statements.
    van den Broek P
    Child Dev; 1989 Apr; 60(2):286-97. PubMed ID: 2924653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Violations of coherence in subjective probability: a representational and assessment processes account.
    Mandel DR
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):130-56. PubMed ID: 17300773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Temporal integration: an incentive approach to conflict resolution.
    Renner KE
    Prog Exp Pers Res; 1967; 4():127-77. PubMed ID: 4867094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.