These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1271030)
1. Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, and visual word recognition. Schvaneveldt RW; Meyer DE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 May; 2(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 1271030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition. Schmidtke D; Matsuki K; Kuperman V J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1793-1820. PubMed ID: 28447810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Semantic Ambiguity: Do Multiple Meanings Inhibit or Facilitate Word Recognition? Haro J; Ferré P J Psycholinguist Res; 2018 Jun; 47(3):679-698. PubMed ID: 29280032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: an MEG study. Beretta A; Fiorentino R; Poeppel D Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 15922158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Settling Into Semantic Space: An Ambiguity-Focused Account of Word-Meaning Access. Rodd JM Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Mar; 15(2):411-427. PubMed ID: 31961780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition. Kellas G; Ferraro FR; Simpson GB J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1988 Nov; 14(4):601-9. PubMed ID: 2974871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lexical factors in conceptual processes: The relationship between semantic representations and their corresponding phonological and orthographic lexical forms. Peleg O; Edelist L; Eviatar Z; Bergerbest D Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):519-37. PubMed ID: 26637339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Emotionality effects in ambiguous word recognition: The crucial role of the affective congruence between distinct meanings of ambiguous words. Ferré P; Haro J; Huete-Pérez D; Fraga I Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jul; 74(7):1234-1243. PubMed ID: 33438523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Right hemisphere language processing: lateral difference with imageable and nonimageable ambiguous words. Deloche G; Seron X; Scius G; Segui J Brain Lang; 1987 Mar; 30(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 3567547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. To mind the mind: an event-related potential study of word class and semantic ambiguity. Lee CL; Federmeier KD Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1081(1):191-202. PubMed ID: 16516169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Morpho-semantic processing in word recognition: evidence from balanced and biased ambiguous morphemes. Tsang YK; Chen HC J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1990-2001. PubMed ID: 23834058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ambiguity advantage revisited: two meanings are better than one when accessing Chinese nouns. Lin CJ; Ahrens K J Psycholinguist Res; 2010 Feb; 39(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 19582583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Understanding words in context: the role of Broca's area in word comprehension. Bedny M; Hulbert JC; Thompson-Schill SL Brain Res; 2007 May; 1146():101-14. PubMed ID: 17123486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lexical access and selection of contextually appropriate meaning for ambiguous words. Ihara A; Hayakawa T; Wei Q; Munetsuna S; Fujimaki N Neuroimage; 2007 Nov; 38(3):576-88. PubMed ID: 17888689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemispheric asymmetries in semantic processing: evidence from false memories for ambiguous words. Faust M; Ben-Artzi E; Harel I Brain Lang; 2008 Jun; 105(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 18178246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks. Piercey CD; Joordens S Mem Cognit; 2000 Jun; 28(4):657-66. PubMed ID: 10946548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. Becker CA J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 May; 5(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 528937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An on-line investigation of lexical ambiguity processing in schizophrenia. Copland D; Chenery H; Savage G; McGrath J Brain Cogn; 2002; 48(2-3):324-7. PubMed ID: 12030460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A database of orthography-semantics consistency (OSC) estimates for 15,017 English words. Marelli M; Amenta S Behav Res Methods; 2018 Aug; 50(4):1482-1495. PubMed ID: 29372490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Polysemy Advantage with Abstract But Not Concrete Words. Jager B; Cleland AA J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Feb; 45(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 25373555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]