BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12710789)

  • 1. Comparison of times to intubate a simulated trauma patient in two positions.
    Pinchalk M; Roth RN; Paris PM; Hostler D
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2003; 7(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 12710789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study.
    Madziala M; Smereka J; Dabrowski M; Leung S; Ruetzler K; Szarpak L
    Eur J Pediatr; 2017 Jun; 176(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 28429117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Paramedic intubation: patient position might matter.
    Clemency BM; Roginski M; Lindstrom HA; Billittier AJ
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2014; 18(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 24460424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ET-View compared to direct laryngoscopy in patients with immobilized cervical spine by unexperienced physicians: A randomized crossover manikin trial.
    Karczewska K; Szarpak L; Smereka J; Dabrowski M; Ladny JR; Wieczorek W; Robak O; Frass M; Ahuja S; Ruetzler K
    Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther; 2017; 49(4):274-282. PubMed ID: 28953308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. C-MAC compared with direct laryngoscopy for intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: A manikin trial.
    Smereka J; Ladny JR; Naylor A; Ruetzler K; Szarpak L
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1142-1146. PubMed ID: 28341185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparison of Paramedic First Pass Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate of the VividTrac VT-A 100, GlideScope Ranger, and Direct Laryngoscopy Under Simulated Prehospital Cervical Spinal Immobilization Conditions in a Cadaveric Model.
    Hodnick R; Zitek T; Galster K; Johnson S; Bledsoe B; Ebbs D
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2017 Dec; 32(6):621-624. PubMed ID: 28807073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Paramedic use of endotracheal tube introducers for the difficult airway.
    Le DH; Reed DB; Weinstein G; Gregory M; Brown LH
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2001; 5(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 11339725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of the intubating laryngeal mask airway by medical and nonmedical personnel.
    Levitan RM; Ochroch EA; Stuart S; Hollander JE
    Am J Emerg Med; 2000 Jan; 18(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 10674524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blind tracheal intubation by paramedics through the LMA-Unique.
    Barnes DR; Reed DB; Weinstein G; Brown LH
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2003; 7(4):470-3. PubMed ID: 14582101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prehospital oral endotracheal intubation by rural basic emergency medical technicians.
    Bradley JS; Billows GL; Olinger ML; Boha SP; Cordell WH; Nelson DR
    Ann Emerg Med; 1998 Jul; 32(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 9656945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of bougie-assisted intubation with traditional endotracheal intubation in a simulated difficult airway.
    Messa MJ; Kupas DF; Dunham DL
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 21067319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of different video laryngoscopes for emergency intubation in a standardized airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by experienced anaesthetists. A randomized, controlled crossover trial.
    Wetsch WA; Spelten O; Hellmich M; Carlitscheck M; Padosch SA; Lier H; Böttiger BW; Hinkelbein J
    Resuscitation; 2012 Jun; 83(6):740-5. PubMed ID: 22155448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope and blind intubation via the iGEL for Intubation With C-spine immobilization: A Randomized, crossover, manikin trial.
    Gawlowski P; Smereka J; Madziala M; Szarpak L; Frass M; Robak O
    Am J Emerg Med; 2017 Mar; 35(3):484-487. PubMed ID: 28041757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of bonfils fiberscope-assisted laryngoscopy and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated difficult pediatric intubation: a manikin study.
    Vlatten A; Aucoin S; Litz S; MacManus B; Soder C
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2010 Jun; 20(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 20412457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the C-MAC Videolaryngoscope and Rigid Fiberscope with Direct Laryngoscopy in Easy and Difficult Airway Scenarios: A Manikin Study.
    Kaplan A; Göksu E; Yıldız G; Kılıç T
    J Emerg Med; 2016 Mar; 50(3):e107-14. PubMed ID: 26725922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Airway Management Methods in Entrapped Patients: A Manikin Study.
    Martin AB; Lingg J; Lubin JS
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2016; 20(5):657-61. PubMed ID: 26954013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pentax Airway Scope AWS-S200 video laryngoscope for child tracheal intubation in a manikin study with 3 airway scenarios.
    Szarpak Ł; Czyżewski Ł; Truszewski Z; Kurowski A
    Am J Emerg Med; 2015 Sep; 33(9):1171-4. PubMed ID: 26143310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Paramedic use of the endotracheal tube introducer in a difficult airway model.
    Phelan MP; Moscati R; D'Aprix T; Miller G
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2003; 7(2):244-6. PubMed ID: 12710787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of different patient positions during rapid induction with severe regurgitation on the volume of aspirate and time to intubation: a prospective randomised manikin simulation study.
    St Pierre M; Krischke F; Luetcke B; Schmidt J
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30678655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of intubation using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy--a manikin study.
    Maharaj CH; Higgins BD; Harte BH; Laffey JG
    Anaesthesia; 2006 May; 61(5):469-77. PubMed ID: 16674623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.