These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12711232)

  • 1. Effect of brain damage and source location on left-right asymmetry of visual evoked potentials in a realistic model of the head.
    Radai MM; Rosenfeld M; Abboud S
    Med Eng Phys; 2003 Jun; 25(5):349-59. PubMed ID: 12711232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Left-right asymmetry of visual evoked potentials in brain-damaged patients: a mathematical model and experimental results.
    Abboud S; Bar L; Rosenfeld M; Ring H; Glass I
    Ann Biomed Eng; 1996; 24(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 8669720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional correlates with left-right asymmetry of visual evoked potentials in stroke patients: modeling and experimental results.
    Ring H; Bar L; Abboud S
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1999 Feb; 80(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 10025491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of source location on the scalp potential asymmetry in a numerical model of the head.
    Abboud S; Rosenfeld M; Luzon J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Jul; 43(7):690-6. PubMed ID: 9216140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dipole estimation errors due to differences in modeling anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Van Hese P; Delputte S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1877-94. PubMed ID: 18364544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monitoring brain damage using bioimpedance technique in a 3D numerical model of the head.
    Cohen R; Abboud S; Arad M
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 May; 37(5):453-9. PubMed ID: 25771429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dipole estimation errors due to not incorporating anisotropic conductivities in realistic head models for EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Staelens S; Lemahieu I
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6079-93. PubMed ID: 19779215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-resolution EEG: on the cortical equivalent dipole layer imaging.
    He B; Yao D; Lian J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Feb; 113(2):227-35. PubMed ID: 11856627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of cortical dipole sources by equivalent dipole layer imaging and independent component analysis.
    Aoki N; Hori J; He B
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():992-5. PubMed ID: 17945613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reversal of cerebral asymmetry in schizophrenia measured with magnetoencephalography.
    Tiihonen J; Katila H; Pekkonen E; Jääskeläinen IP; Huotilainen M; Aronen HJ; Ilmoniemi RJ; Räsänen P; Virtanen J; Salli E; Karhu J
    Schizophr Res; 1998 Apr; 30(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 9589515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison between realistic and spherical approaches in EEG forward modelling.
    Meneghini F; Vatta F; Esposito F; Mininel S; Di Salle F
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2010 Jun; 55(3):133-46. PubMed ID: 20178450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Head model extension for the study of bioelectric phenomena.
    Bruno P; Vatta F; Mininel S; Inchingolo P
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():59-64. PubMed ID: 12724869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography in a realistic geometry head model: a simulation study.
    Ding L; Lai Y; He B
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jan; 50(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 15715421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of head models on neuromagnetic fields and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Haueisen J; Schimpf PH
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Oct; 5():55. PubMed ID: 17059601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of head models on EEG simulations and inverse source localizations.
    Ramon C; Schimpf PH; Haueisen J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Feb; 5():10. PubMed ID: 16466570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Topographic mapping of the visual evoked potential after source derivation.
    Carreño-Rimaudo SV; Catelli-Infantosi AF
    Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(1-2):5-13. PubMed ID: 7968865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Generators of visual evoked potentials investigated by dipole tracing in the human occipital cortex.
    Ikeda H; Nishijo H; Miyamoto K; Tamura R; Endo S; Ono T
    Neuroscience; 1998 Jun; 84(3):723-39. PubMed ID: 9579779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between source asymmetry and scalp potential asymmetry in a prolate spheroid model of the head.
    Eshel Y; Abboud S
    Comput Biol Med; 1997 Mar; 27(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 9158916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The surface area of early visual cortex predicts the amplitude of the visual evoked potential.
    Elvsåshagen T; Moberget T; Bøen E; Hol PK; Malt UF; Andersson S; Westlye LT
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1229-36. PubMed ID: 24415060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linking a neural mass model with a 3D model of the human brain to reproduce EEG signals.
    Petersen S; Zimmermann U; Schmidt C; Schwabe L; Warkentin M; Teipel SJ
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2014 Jun; 59(3):231-40. PubMed ID: 24515994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.