BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12711240)

  • 41. Detecting femur-insert collisions to improve precision of fluoroscopic knee arthroplasty analysis.
    Prins AH; Kaptein BL; Stoel BC; Reiber JH; Valstar ER
    J Biomech; 2010 Mar; 43(4):694-700. PubMed ID: 20004899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A simplified radiographic method for measuring bone-component motion in total knees.
    Walker PS; Sathasivam S
    J Biomech; 1992 Sep; 25(9):1059-66. PubMed ID: 1517266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. EOS orthopaedic imaging system to study patellofemoral kinematics: assessment of uncertainty.
    Azmy C; Guérard S; Bonnet X; Gabrielli F; Skalli W
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2010 Feb; 96(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 20170853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics.
    Dennis DA; Mahfouz MR; Komistek RD; Hoff W
    J Biomech; 2005 Feb; 38(2):241-53. PubMed ID: 15598450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Quantifying the tibiofemoral joint space using x-ray tomosynthesis.
    Kalinosky B; Sabol JM; Piacsek K; Heckel B; Gilat Schmidt T
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6672-82. PubMed ID: 22149849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An optimized image matching method for determining in-vivo TKA kinematics with a dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic imaging system.
    Bingham J; Li G
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Aug; 128(4):588-95. PubMed ID: 16813450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Registration of 6-DOFs electrogoniometry and CT medical imaging for 3D joint modeling.
    Van Sint Jan S; Salvia P; Hilal I; Sholukha V; Rooze M; Clapworthy G
    J Biomech; 2002 Nov; 35(11):1475-84. PubMed ID: 12413966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Automatic registration between reference and on-board digital tomosynthesis images for positioning verification.
    Ren L; Godfrey DJ; Yan H; Wu QJ; Yin FF
    Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):664-72. PubMed ID: 18383688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Evaluation of a new low-dose biplanar system to assess lower-limb alignment in 3D: a phantom study.
    Thelen P; Delin C; Folinais D; Radier C
    Skeletal Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(10):1287-93. PubMed ID: 22684406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Handling modular hip implants in model-based RSA: combined stem-head models.
    Prins AH; Kaptein BL; Stoel BC; Nelissen RG; Reiber JH; Valstar ER
    J Biomech; 2008 Oct; 41(14):2912-7. PubMed ID: 18805532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Stereographic targeting in prostate radiotherapy: speed and precision by daily automatic positioning corrections using kilovoltage/megavoltage image pairs.
    Mutanga TF; de Boer HC; van der Wielen GJ; Wentzler D; Barnhoorn J; Incrocci L; Heijmen BJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jul; 71(4):1074-83. PubMed ID: 18207657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The quality of bone surfaces may govern the use of model based fluoroscopy in the determination of joint laxity.
    Moewis P; Wolterbeek N; Diederichs G; Valstar E; Heller MO; Taylor WR
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Dec; 34(10):1427-32. PubMed ID: 22342557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comment on "an inverse-geometry volumetric CT system with a large-area scanned source: a feasibility study" [Med. Phys. 31, 2623-2627 (2004)].
    Silver MD
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):635; author reply 636. PubMed ID: 15789610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Skeletal landmarks for TKR implantations: evaluation of their accuracy using EOS imaging acquisition system.
    Schlatterer B; Suedhoff I; Bonnet X; Catonne Y; Maestro M; Skalli W
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Feb; 95(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 19251231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Sensitivity of finite helical axis parameters to temporally varying realistic motion utilizing an idealized knee model.
    Johnson TS; Andriacchi TP; Erdman AG
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2004; 218(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 15116896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Femoral anatomical frame: assessment of various definitions.
    Della Croce U; Camomilla V; Leardini A; Cappozzo A
    Med Eng Phys; 2003 Jun; 25(5):425-31. PubMed ID: 12711241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. C-arm calibration--is it really necessary?
    Jain A; Kon R; Zhou Y; Fichtinger G
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2005; 8(Pt 1):639-46. PubMed ID: 16685900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Three-dimensional determination of femoral-tibial contact positions under in vivo conditions using fluoroscopy.
    Hoff WA; Komistek RD; Dennis DA; Gabriel SM; Walker SA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 1998 Oct; 13(7):455-472. PubMed ID: 11415822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Development of three-dimensional kinematic analysis system for artificial knee implants using X-ray fluoroscopic imaging].
    Yamazaki T; Watanabe T; Nakajima Y; Sugamoto K; Tomita T; Maeda D; Sato Y; Yoshikawa H; Tamura S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Jan; 61(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15682035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Experimental analysis of Model-Based Roentgen Stereophotogrammetric Analysis (MBRSA) on four typical prosthesis components.
    Seehaus F; Emmerich J; Kaptein BL; Windhagen H; Hurschler C
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Apr; 131(4):041004. PubMed ID: 19275433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.