These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. US bungled investigation into weapons research in Iraq. Giles J; Brumfiel G Nature; 2005 May; 435(7038):5. PubMed ID: 15874983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Scientists and the history of biological weapons. A brief historical overview of the development of biological weapons in the twentieth century. Guillemin J EMBO Rep; 2006 Jul; 7 Spec No(Spec No):S45-9. PubMed ID: 16819450 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Adequate regulation, a stop-gap measure, or part of a package? Debates on codes of conduct for scientists could be diverting attention away from more serious questions. Corneliussen F EMBO Rep; 2006 Jul; 7 Spec No(Spec No):S50-4. PubMed ID: 16819451 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biosafety committees come under scrutiny. Field K Chron High Educ; 2005 Apr; 51(34):A22-3. PubMed ID: 16018097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. US report pins down future biosecurity. Wadman M Nature; 2010 Aug; 466(7307):678. PubMed ID: 20686545 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. US selects regional biodefence hubs. Dalton R Nature; 2003 Sep; 425(6954):110. PubMed ID: 12968137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Isolationism is not the answer to bioterrorism. Singh JA; Singer PA Nature; 2002 Dec; 420(6916):605. PubMed ID: 12478264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Scientist support for biological weapons controls. Alberts B; May RM Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5596):1135. PubMed ID: 12424342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. US biodefense--shocking and awful. Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jun; 25(6):603. PubMed ID: 17557081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientists placated as US bill gets tough on bioterror. Gewin V Nature; 2002 May; 417(6888):475. PubMed ID: 12037529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]