173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12712347)
1. Influence of the subcutaneous fat layer, as measured by ultrasound, skinfold calipers and BMI, on the EMG amplitude.
Nordander C; Willner J; Hansson GA; Larsson B; Unge J; Granquist L; Skerfving S
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2003 Aug; 89(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 12712347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does normalization of voluntary EMG amplitude to M
Lanza MB; Balshaw TG; Massey GJ; Folland JP
Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2018 Dec; 28(12):2558-2566. PubMed ID: 30030921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of subcutaneous fat measurement: comparison of skinfold calipers, ultrasound, and computed tomography.
Orphanidou C; McCargar L; Birmingham CL; Mathieson J; Goldner E
J Am Diet Assoc; 1994 Aug; 94(8):855-8. PubMed ID: 8046177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skinfold caliper and ultrasound assessments of change in the distribution of subcutaneous fat during adolescent pregnancy.
Stevens-Simon C; Thureen P; Barrett J; Stamm E
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Sep; 25(9):1340-5. PubMed ID: 11571597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Correlation between skinfold thickness and ultrasonography in the study of subcutaneous adipose tissue in females].
Cataldo MG; Brancato D; Brancato G; Verga S; Buscemi S; Licata G
Ann Ital Med Int; 1997; 12(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 9409947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of ultrasound and skinfold caliper measurement of subcutaneous fat tissue.
Weits T; van der Beek EJ; Wedel M
Int J Obes; 1986; 10(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 3531051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Body composition in sport: a comparison of a novel ultrasound imaging technique to measure subcutaneous fat tissue compared with skinfold measurement.
Müller W; Horn M; Fürhapter-Rieger A; Kainz P; Kröpfl JM; Maughan RJ; Ahammer H
Br J Sports Med; 2013 Nov; 47(16):1028-35. PubMed ID: 24055780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electromyographic recordings of paraspinal muscles: variations related to subcutaneous tissue thickness.
Hemingway MA; Biedermann HJ; Inglis J
Biofeedback Self Regul; 1995 Mar; 20(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 7786926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of skinfold calipers as a tool for measuring body fat in human beings.
Walia BN; Bhalla AK; Suri S
Indian J Med Res; 1992 Aug; 96():255-7. PubMed ID: 1428065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of four techniques for measuring central adiposity in postpartum adolescents.
Stevens-Simon C; Thureen P; Stamm E; Scherzinger A
J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun; 10(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 11444792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasonic and skinfold caliper measures of subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness in elderly men and women.
Chumlea WC; Roche AF
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1986 Nov; 71(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 3544855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of ultrasonographic and anthropometric methods to assess body fat in childhood obesity.
Semiz S; Ozgören E; Sabir N
Int J Obes (Lond); 2007 Jan; 31(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 16788571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of subcutaneous adipose tissue using ultrasound images.
Ramirez ME
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1992 Nov; 89(3):347-57. PubMed ID: 1485642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of B-mode ultrasonic measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue and intra-abdominal depth: comparisons with skinfold thicknesses.
Bellisari A; Roche AF; Siervogel RM
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1993 Aug; 17(8):475-80. PubMed ID: 8401751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of contraction amplitude and firing history on spike-triggered averaged trapezius motor unit potentials.
Westad C; Westgaard RH
J Physiol; 2005 Feb; 562(Pt 3):965-75. PubMed ID: 15576452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does sEMG normalization change results on sex differences in the activation of the shoulder girdle muscles during a simulated work task?
Cid MM; Januario LB; Moreira RFC; Côté JN; Madeleine P; Oliveira AB
Appl Ergon; 2020 May; 85():103044. PubMed ID: 31932265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of near infra-red interactance for assessment of subcutaneous and total body fat.
Brooke-Wavell K; Jones PR; Norgan NG; Hardman AE
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1995 Jan; 49(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 7713052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasonic measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness in man.
Jones PR; Davies PS; Norgan NG
Am J Phys Anthropol; 1986 Nov; 71(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 3544856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement of subcutaneous fat thickness with high frequency pulsed ultrasound: comparisons with a caliper and a radiographic technique.
Black D; Vora J; Hayward M; Marks R
Clin Phys Physiol Meas; 1988 Feb; 9(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 3282753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the use of EMG-ratios to assess the coordination of back muscles.
Larivière C; Arsenault AB
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Dec; 23(10):1209-19. PubMed ID: 18926609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
