These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12714555)

  • 1. Commentary: black and white or shades of grey?
    Battaglia M; Pewsner D
    Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 32(2):314-5. PubMed ID: 12714555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of diagnostic tests without gold standards.
    Hui SL; Zhou XH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):354-70. PubMed ID: 9871952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Teaching information mastery: the case of baby Jeff and the importance of Bayes' theorem.
    Slawson DC; Shaughnessy AF
    Fam Med; 2002 Feb; 34(2):140-2. PubMed ID: 11874025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A grey zone for quantitative diagnostic and screening tests.
    Coste J; Pouchot J
    Int J Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 32(2):304-13. PubMed ID: 12714554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Basic principles of diagnostic evaluation].
    Cohen J; Dubos F; Bossuyt P; Chalumeau M; Levy C; Martinot A
    Arch Pediatr; 2015 May; 22(5 Suppl 1):186-7. PubMed ID: 26112584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Complementary examinations].
    Huguier M
    Chirurgia (Bucur); 2005; 100(1):85-7. PubMed ID: 15810712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles.
    ; Banoo S; Bell D; Bossuyt P; Herring A; Mabey D; Poole F; Smith PG; Sriram N; Wongsrichanalai C; Linke R; O'Brien R; Perkins M
    Nat Rev Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 6(11 Suppl):S16-26. PubMed ID: 22745954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimates of diagnostic accuracy efficacy: how well can this test perform the classification task?
    Trop I; Stolberg HO; Nahmias C
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2003 Apr; 54(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 12736916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adjusting for differential-verification bias in diagnostic-accuracy studies: a Bayesian approach.
    de Groot JA; Dendukuri N; Janssen KJ; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Moons KG
    Epidemiology; 2011 Mar; 22(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21228702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The leaf plot: a novel way of presenting the value of tests.
    Coulthard MG; Coulthard T
    Br J Gen Pract; 2019 Apr; 69(681):205-206. PubMed ID: 30858331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Diagnostic studies should follow international guidelines. Planning and evaluation requires theoretical and practical considerations].
    Björk J; Hellström M; Mejare I; Nyman U
    Lakartidningen; 2013 Mar 13-19; 110(11):562-5. PubMed ID: 23596850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Clinical use of diagnostic tests (Part 1): Analysis of the properties of a diagnostic test].
    Cerda L J; Cifuentes A L
    Rev Chilena Infectol; 2010 Jun; 27(3):205-8. PubMed ID: 20737121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The spectrum effect in tests for risk prediction, screening, and diagnosis.
    Usher-Smith JA; Sharp SJ; Griffin SJ
    BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3139. PubMed ID: 27334281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnosis in General Practice. Using probabilistic reasoning.
    Doust J
    BMJ; 2009 Nov; 339():b3823. PubMed ID: 19887528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Presentation of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Broce M; Reyes B
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Feb; 144(3):220-1; author reply 221-2. PubMed ID: 16461972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Presentation of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Brotman DJ
    Ann Intern Med; 2006 Feb; 144(3):221; author reply 221-2. PubMed ID: 16461974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic Stewardship-Leveraging the Laboratory to Improve Antimicrobial Use.
    Morgan DJ; Malani P; Diekema DJ
    JAMA; 2017 Aug; 318(7):607-608. PubMed ID: 28759678
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values: diagnosing purple mange.
    Collier J; Huebscher R
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2010 Apr; 22(4):205-9. PubMed ID: 20409258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The wizard of odds: Bayes theorem and diagnostic testing.
    Diamond GA
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1999 Nov; 74(11):1179-82. PubMed ID: 10560608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Commentary on "propagation of uncertainty in bayesian diagnostic test interpretation".
    Frisch LE; Morrison K
    South Med J; 2012 Sep; 105(9):460-1. PubMed ID: 22948323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.