These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12714555)

  • 21. Small sample estimation of relative accuracy for binary screening tests.
    Alonzo TA; Braun TM; Moskowitz CS
    Stat Med; 2004 Jan; 23(1):21-34. PubMed ID: 14695637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bayes theorem. Diagnostic testing for tuberculosis in children.
    Carlen R
    Chest; 1994 Aug; 106(2):655-6. PubMed ID: 7774380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cochran's Q test was useful to assess heterogeneity in likelihood ratios in studies of diagnostic accuracy.
    Cohen JF; Chalumeau M; Cohen R; Korevaar DA; Khoshnood B; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 68(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 25441698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sensitivity and specificity should be de-emphasized in diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Moons KG; Harrell FE
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun; 10(6):670-2. PubMed ID: 12809422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bayesian clinical reasoning: does intuitive estimation of likelihood ratios on an ordinal scale outperform estimation of sensitivities and specificities?
    Moreira J; Bisoffi Z; Narváez A; Van den Ende J
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):934-40. PubMed ID: 19018928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Using characteristic numbers to estimate the usefulness of laboratory tests for diagnosis].
    Uhari M
    Duodecim; 2004; 120(8):935-41. PubMed ID: 15185506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. New methods in the assessment of diagnostic procedures.
    Kleijnen J
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2006; 100(7):519-25. PubMed ID: 17137065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Diagnosis by the bit: a method for evaluating the diagnostic process.
    Johnson HA
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1989; 19(5):323-31. PubMed ID: 2679350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sensitivity and Specificity or Positive and Negative Percent Agreement? A Micro-Comic Strip.
    McAdam AJ
    J Clin Microbiol; 2017 Nov; 55(11):3153-3154. PubMed ID: 29066563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bayes theorem: Fully informed rational estimates of diagnostic probabilities.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Jun; 141(6):658-9. PubMed ID: 20516096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sample size for diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Salmi LR; Michel P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 57(8):869-70; author reply 871-2. PubMed ID: 15485744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bayes theorem for the clinician.
    Hall GH; Round AP
    West Engl Med J; 1990 Dec; 105(4):106-9. PubMed ID: 1369537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative accuracy: assessing new tests against existing diagnostic pathways.
    Bossuyt PM; Irwig L; Craig J; Glasziou P
    BMJ; 2006 May; 332(7549):1089-92. PubMed ID: 16675820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Roaming through methodology. X. The testing of diagnostic procedures].
    Bossuyt PM; Lijmer JG; Mol BW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Oct; 142(43):2345-7. PubMed ID: 9864513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A philosophical approach to diagnostic test evaluation.
    Sonke GS; Verbeek AL; Kiemeney LA
    Ann Intern Med; 2007 May; 146(10):757; author reply 757-8. PubMed ID: 17502640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Correcting for verification bias in studies of a diagnostic test's accuracy.
    Zhou XH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1998 Dec; 7(4):337-53. PubMed ID: 9871951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The STARD initiative: a possible link to diagnostic accuracy and reduction in medical error.
    McQueen MJ
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2003 Jul; 40(Pt 4):307-8. PubMed ID: 12880531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Insufficient studies of diagnostic cancer tests. Neither systematic review nor original studies come up to expectations].
    Holmberg L
    Lakartidningen; 2007 Apr 25-May 1; 104(17):1308-9. PubMed ID: 17547275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Test research versus diagnostic research.
    Moons KG; Biesheuvel CJ; Grobbee DE
    Clin Chem; 2004 Mar; 50(3):473-6. PubMed ID: 14981027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evidence based diagnostics.
    Gluud C; Gluud LL
    BMJ; 2005 Mar; 330(7493):724-6. PubMed ID: 15790646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.