These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12715080)

  • 1. Comparative performance of two air samplers for monitoring airborne fungal propagules.
    Távora LG; Gambale W; Heins-Vaccari EM; Arriagada GL; Lacaz CS; Santos CR; Levin AS
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2003 May; 36(5):613-6. PubMed ID: 12715080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A field comparison of four samplers for enumerating fungal aerosols I. Sampling characteristics.
    Lee KS; Bartlett KH; Brauer M; Stephens GM; Black WA; Teschke K
    Indoor Air; 2004 Oct; 14(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 15330796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of field performance of the Andersen N6 single stage and the SAS sampler for airborne fungal propagules.
    Bellin P; Schillinger J
    Indoor Air; 2001 Mar; 11(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 11235232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A field comparison of four fungal aerosol sampling instruments: inter-sampler calibrations and caveats.
    Lee KS; Teschke K; Brauer M; Bartlett KH
    Indoor Air; 2004 Oct; 14(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 15330797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of sampling duration on recovery of culturable fungi using the Andersen N6 and RCS bioaerosol samplers.
    Saldanha R; Manno M; Saleh M; Ewaze JO; Scott JA
    Indoor Air; 2008 Dec; 18(6):464-72. PubMed ID: 18761682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of three portable samplers for monitoring airborne fungi.
    Mehta SK; Mishra SK; Pierson DL
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1996 May; 62(5):1835-8. PubMed ID: 11536729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative performance of impactor air samplers for quantification of fungal contamination.
    Nesa D; Lortholary J; Bouakline A; Bordes M; Chandenier J; Derouin F; Gangneux JP
    J Hosp Infect; 2001 Feb; 47(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 11170780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relation between fungal propagules in indoor air and home characteristics.
    Ren P; Jankun TM; Belanger K; Bracken MB; Leaderer BP
    Allergy; 2001 May; 56(5):419-24. PubMed ID: 11350305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Airborne fungal community composition in indoor environments in Beijing].
    Fang ZG; Ouyang ZY; Liu P; Sun L; Wang XY
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2013 May; 34(5):2031-7. PubMed ID: 23914564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Short-term versus long-term filter cassette sampling for viable fungi in indoor air: comparative performance of the Sartorius MD8 and the GSP sampler.
    Engelhart S; Exner M
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2002 Oct; 205(6):443-51. PubMed ID: 12455266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chamber evaluation of a personal, bioaerosol cyclone sampler.
    Macher J; Chen B; Rao C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):702-12. PubMed ID: 18720289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Airborne Fungal Aerosol Concentration and Distribution Characteristics in Air- Conditioned Wards].
    Zhang HL; Feng HH; Fang ZL; Wang BD; Li D
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2015 Apr; 36(4):1234-40. PubMed ID: 26164895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating fungal populations by genera/species on wide body commercial passenger aircraft and in airport terminals.
    McKernan LT; Burge H; Wallingford KM; Hein MJ; Herrick R
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Apr; 51(3):281-91. PubMed ID: 17351266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Profiles of airborne fungi in buildings and outdoor environments in the United States.
    Shelton BG; Kirkland KH; Flanders WD; Morris GK
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2002 Apr; 68(4):1743-53. PubMed ID: 11916692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Air sampling of Aspergillus fumigatus and other thermotolerant fungi: comparative performance of the Sartorius MD8 airport and the Merck MAS-100 portable bioaerosol sampler.
    Engelhart S; Glasmacher A; Simon A; Exner M
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2007 Dec; 210(6):733-739. PubMed ID: 17142101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Profiles of Environmental Mold: Indoor and Outdoor Air Sampling in a Hematology Hospital in Seoul, South Korea.
    Cho SY; Myong JP; Kim WB; Park C; Lee SJ; Lee SH; Lee DG
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Nov; 15(11):. PubMed ID: 30445685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments.
    An HR; Mainelis G; Yao M
    Indoor Air; 2004 Dec; 14(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 15500631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of environmental factors on airborne fungi in houses of Santa Fe City, Argentina.
    Basilico Mde L; Chiericatti C; Aringoli EE; Althaus RL; Basilico JC
    Sci Total Environ; 2007 Apr; 376(1-3):143-50. PubMed ID: 17320936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Molecular comparison of the sampling efficiency of four types of airborne bacterial samplers.
    Li K
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Nov; 409(24):5493-8. PubMed ID: 21968260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fungal diversity and Aspergillus species in hospital environments.
    Martínez-Herrera EO; Frías De-León MG; Duarte-Escalante E; Calderón-Ezquerro Mdel C; Jiménez-Martínez Mdel C; Acosta-Altamirano G; Rivera-Becerril F; Toriello C; Reyes Montes Mdel R
    Ann Agric Environ Med; 2016 Jun; 23(2):264-9. PubMed ID: 27294630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.