133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12715399)
1. [Quantitative evaluation of reproducibility of clinical laboratory data day by day].
Balakhovskiĭ IS
Klin Lab Diagn; 2003 Mar; (3):50-4. PubMed ID: 12715399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Uncertainty of measurement in clinical laboratory sciences.
Fuentes-Arderiu X
Clin Chem; 2000 Sep; 46(9):1437-8. PubMed ID: 10973882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of likelihood ratios improves interpretation of laboratory testing for pulmonary sarcoidosis.
De Smet D; Martens GA; Berghe BV; Meysman M; Heylen O; Gorus FK; De Waele M
Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Dec; 134(6):939-47. PubMed ID: 21088158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated validation of clinical laboratory test results: do we get what we expect?
De Smet D; Nanos N; Martens GA; Smet L; Damiaens S; Van Moer G; De Pauw A; Jochmans K; De Waele M
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2009; 47(3):379-80. PubMed ID: 19327109
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Interpretation of statistics in clinical laboratory studies.
Kay LW; Gebert MA
Clin Lab Sci; 2006; 19(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 16617554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of several point-of-care testing (POCT) glucometers with an established laboratory procedure for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes using the discordance rate. A new statistical approach.
Püntmann I; Wosniok W; Haeckel R
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Jun; 41(6):809-20. PubMed ID: 12880146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The rank correlation coefficient: an additional aid in the interpretation of laboratory data.
Estelberger W; Reibnegger G
Clin Chim Acta; 1995 Aug; 239(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 8542659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. When to re-order laboratory tests? Learning laboratory test shelf-life.
Levy-Fix G; Gorman SL; Sepulveda JL; Elhadad N
J Biomed Inform; 2018 Sep; 85():21-29. PubMed ID: 30036675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Paired coefficients in the correlation of clinico-laboratory signs: artifacts and interpretation difficulties].
Genkin AA
Klin Lab Diagn; 1993; (6):71-3. PubMed ID: 8032792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. External Quality Assessment: an effective tool for Clinical Governance in laboratory medicine.
Sciacovelli L; Secchiero S; Zardo L; Zaninotto M; Plebani M
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2006; 44(6):740-9. PubMed ID: 16729863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A bridge between evidence-based laboratory diagnostics and research in neuroimmunology: why standardizations and guidelines matter.
Franciotta D; Uccelli A;
Neurol Sci; 2017 Oct; 38(Suppl 2):213-216. PubMed ID: 29030771
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical considerations for calculation of immunogenicity screening assay cut points.
Hoffman D; Berger M
J Immunol Methods; 2011 Oct; 373(1-2):200-8. PubMed ID: 21906599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantifying the bias associated with use of discrepant analysis.
Lipman HB; Astles JR
Clin Chem; 1998 Jan; 44(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 9550567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of the Bland-Altman plot for interpretation of method-comparison studies: a critical investigation of its practice.
Dewitte K; Fierens C; Stöckl D; Thienpont LM
Clin Chem; 2002 May; 48(5):799-801; author reply 801-2. PubMed ID: 11978620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Italian multicentre study for application of a diagnostic algorithm in autoantibody testing for autoimmune rheumatic disease: conclusive results.
Bonaguri C; Melegari A; Ballabio A; Parmeggiani M; Russo A; Battistelli L; Aloe R; Trenti T; Lippi G
Autoimmun Rev; 2011 Nov; 11(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 21741498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Strength of the signal, analytical variability, and predictive value of test results.
Malvano R; Chiecchio A; Ferdeghini M
Clin Chem; 1993 Apr; 39(4):697-8. PubMed ID: 8472374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality indicators for laboratory diagnostics: consensus is needed.
Plebani M; Sciacovelli L; Lippi G
Ann Clin Biochem; 2011 Sep; 48(Pt 5):479. PubMed ID: 21733928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Detecting outliers in multivariate laboratory data.
Southworth H
J Biopharm Stat; 2008; 18(6):1178-83. PubMed ID: 18991115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistics in the pathology laboratory: diagnostic test interpretation.
Empson MB
Pathology; 2002 Aug; 34(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 12190297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Likelihood ratio and Fagan's nomogram: 2 basic tools for the rational use of clinical laboratory tests].
Aznar-Oroval E; Mancheño-Alvaro A; García-Lozano T; Sánchez-Yepes M
Rev Calid Asist; 2013; 28(6):390-1. PubMed ID: 23786920
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
