BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12715399)

  • 21. Interpretative comments and reference ranges in EQA programs as a tool for improving laboratory appropriateness and effectiveness.
    Sciacovelli L; Zardo L; Secchiero S; Zaninotto M; Plebani M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2003 Jul; 333(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 12849907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Potential usefulness of a combination of inflammatory markers in identifying patients with sarcoidosis and monitoring respiratory functional worsening.
    Paone G; Cammarella I; Di Tanna GL; Vestri A; Leone A; Batzella S; Belli F; Galluccio G; Sebastiani A; Conti V; Terzano C
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Mar; 137(3):497-9. PubMed ID: 22338066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The reliability of calculated laboratory results.
    Coskun A
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2005; 43(8):880-2. PubMed ID: 16201901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measurement uncertainty and clinical interpretation of measurement results.
    Fuentes-Arderiu X; Rigo-Bonnin R
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2014 Aug; 52(8):e163-5. PubMed ID: 24615487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interpreting diagnostic tests with continuous results and no gold standard: a common scenario explained using the tuberculin skin test.
    Dobler CC; Murad MH
    Evid Based Med; 2017 Dec; 22(6):199-201. PubMed ID: 29056603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Higher order inference for the consensus mean in inter-laboratory studies.
    Sharma G; Mathew T
    Biom J; 2011 Feb; 53(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 21259313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A tolerance interval approach for assessment of agreement with left censored data.
    Choudhary PK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):583-94. PubMed ID: 17613643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reevaluation of the power of error detection of Westgard multirules.
    Jones GR
    Clin Chem; 2004 Apr; 50(4):762-4. PubMed ID: 15044336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Laboratory turnaround time.
    Valenstein P
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Jun; 105(6):676-88. PubMed ID: 8659441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Discordance rate, a new concept for combining diagnostic decisions with analytical performance characteristics. 1. Application in method or sample system comparisons and in defining decision limits.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W; Puentmann I
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Mar; 41(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 12705345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Points of care in using statistics in method comparison studies.
    Westgard JO
    Clin Chem; 1998 Nov; 44(11):2240-2. PubMed ID: 9799748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Biological variations as objective measures of analytical precision and clinic informativity in laboratory tests (lecture)].
    Men'shikov VV; Lukichev TI; Pimenova LM
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2004 May; (5):21-32. PubMed ID: 15230113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improved allocation of costs through analysis of variation in data: planning of laboratory studies.
    Foster TA; Asztalos BF
    Clin Chim Acta; 2001 Dec; 314(1-2):55-66. PubMed ID: 11718679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Frequency and type of preanalytical errors in a laboratory medicine department in India.
    Rattan A; Lippi G
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2008; 46(11):1657-9. PubMed ID: 19012534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A computer program for the derivation of non-parametric reference ranges from patients' results.
    Rao A
    Comput Biol Med; 1990; 20(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 2257733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. LC-MS/MS in clinical laboratories.
    Kushnir MM; Rockwood AL; Bergquist J
    Bioanalysis; 2013 Jan; 5(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 23256466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interpreting method comparison studies by use of the bland-altman plot: reflecting the importance of sample size by incorporating confidence limits and predefined error limits in the graphic.
    Stöckl D; Rodríguez Cabaleiro D; Van Uytfanghe K; Thienpont LM
    Clin Chem; 2004 Nov; 50(11):2216-8. PubMed ID: 15502104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Optimization of results of laboratory measurements in patient biological specimens].
    Kallner A; Khorovskaia LA; Emanuél' VL; Miagkova LM; Bondarenko IB
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2002 Jul; (7):39-42. PubMed ID: 12187590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The errors of our ways.
    Blumenthal D
    Clin Chem; 1997 Aug; 43(8 Pt 1):1305. PubMed ID: 9267304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Abnormal laboratory results : Plausibility, reliability, and implications].
    Lackner KJ; Schellong SM
    Internist (Berl); 2018 Mar; 59(3):234-240. PubMed ID: 29387896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.