These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12715399)

  • 41. Test research versus diagnostic research.
    Moons KG; Biesheuvel CJ; Grobbee DE
    Clin Chem; 2004 Mar; 50(3):473-6. PubMed ID: 14981027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The interpretation of diagnostic tests.
    Shapiro DE
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1999 Jun; 8(2):113-34. PubMed ID: 10501649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The discordance rate, a new concept for combining diagnostic decisions with analytical performance characteristics. 2. Defining analytical goals applied to the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes by blood glucose concentrations.
    Haeckel R; Wosniok W
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004 Feb; 42(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 15061361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Recommendations of the American National Council for Clinical Laboratory Standardization (NCCLS)].
    Balakhovskiĭ IS
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2002 Mar; (3):53-4. PubMed ID: 11980148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Deciphering Sources of Variability in Clinical Pathology.
    Tripathi NK; Everds NE; Schultze AE; Irizarry AR; Hall RL; Provencher A; Aulbach A
    Toxicol Pathol; 2017 Jan; 45(1):90-93. PubMed ID: 27803290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical quality indicators in laboratory medicine: a survey of current practice in the UK.
    Barth JH
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2011 May; 48(Pt 3):238-40. PubMed ID: 21367882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Statistical estimation of the precision of clinico-laboratory measurements].
    Balakhovskiĭ IS
    Klin Lab Diagn; 1998 May; (5):33-8. PubMed ID: 9644924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Managing test demand by clinicians: computer assisted guidelines.
    Peters M
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Feb; 48(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 7745129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Statistical control of the quality of clinical laboratory analyses (a lecture)].
    Balakhovskiĭ IS
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2009 Oct; (10):30-7. PubMed ID: 20000112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Harmonized laboratory results are in tune with effective healthcare goals.
    Christenson RH; Kassed CA
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 May; 3(3):221-4. PubMed ID: 24969146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Uncertainty of measurement].
    Giroud C; Arnaud J; Vassault A;
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2010 Dec; 68 Spec No 1():237-45. PubMed ID: 21613020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Unsupervised knowledge discovery in medical databases using relevance networks.
    Butte AJ; Kohane IS
    Proc AMIA Symp; 1999; ():711-5. PubMed ID: 10566452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Regression models for method comparison data.
    Dunn G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):739-56. PubMed ID: 17613651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A two-stage estimation for screening studies using two diagnostic tests with binary disease status verified in test positives only.
    Li F; Chu H; Nie L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):635-56. PubMed ID: 21920876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluation of the enterovirus laboratory surveillance system in Denmark, 2010 to 2013.
    Condell O; Midgley S; Christiansen CB; Chen M; Chen Nielsen X; Ellermann-Eriksen S; Mølvadgaard M; Schønning K; Vermedal Hoegh S; Andersen PH; Voldstedlund M; Fischer TK
    Euro Surveill; 2016 May; 21(18):. PubMed ID: 27173593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Validity of linear regression in method comparison studies: is it limited by the statistical model or the quality of the analytical input data?
    Stöckl D; Dewitte K; Thienpont LM
    Clin Chem; 1998 Nov; 44(11):2340-6. PubMed ID: 9799762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Establishing reference intervals for clinical laboratory test results: is there a better way?
    Katayev A; Balciza C; Seccombe DW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Feb; 133(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 20093226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Quality control of laboratory results in real time.
    Picco W; Pinna Pintor L; Baruzzo G; Pistono O; Triumbari F; Pinna Pintor P
    Qual Assur Health Care; 1992 Mar; 4(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 1576336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [A programmed system of nonlinear calibration of the devices in an express laboratory].
    Iakovleva NV
    Klin Lab Diagn; 1999 May; (5):12-4. PubMed ID: 10399431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Laboratory blunders revisited.
    Chambers AM; Johnston J; O'Reilly DS
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1994 Jul; 31 ( Pt 4)():390; author reply 391. PubMed ID: 7979111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.