These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. Prevalence of pressure ulcers in Canadian healthcare settings. Woodbury MG; Houghton PE Ostomy Wound Manage; 2004 Oct; 50(10):22-4, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36-8. PubMed ID: 15509880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A comparison of quantitative and qualitative research terms. Saddler D Gastroenterol Nurs; 2007; 30(4):314-6. PubMed ID: 17724411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. A case for non-experimental studies. van Rijswijk L Ostomy Wound Manage; 1998 Oct; 44(10):4-6. PubMed ID: 9866592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: a replication study. Gould D; Goldstone L; Kelly D; Gammon J Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Mar; 41(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 14967190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Secondary analysis of data. Coyer SM; Gallo AM J Pediatr Health Care; 2005; 19(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 15662366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. A counterview on data quality and the systematic review process for occupational injury interventions: are we missing the forest for the trees? Lipscomb HJ; Dement JM Am J Prev Med; 2009 Apr; 36(4):377-8; author reply 378. PubMed ID: 19285201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Methodological aspects of rigor in qualitative nursing research on families involved in intensive care units: a literature review. Høye S; Severinsson E Nurs Health Sci; 2007 Mar; 9(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 17300547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Improving health care through evaluation research: an interview with Katherine Nelson by Pamela J Wood and Lynne S Giddings. Nelson K Nurs Prax N Z; 2006 Nov; 22(3):4-14. PubMed ID: 17375483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Patient satisfaction questionnaires point the finger at nurses. Huffstutter AL Outcomes Manag; 2003; 7(2):89. PubMed ID: 12715606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Inconsistent use of the critical incident technique in nursing research. Bradbury-Jones C; Tranter S J Adv Nurs; 2008 Nov; 64(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 18764849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Research methodology for the formulation of nursing standards]. Muller M Curationis; 1990 Dec; 13(3-4):49-55. PubMed ID: 2091860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Interpretation and presentation of results. Chickens will come home to roost. Beattie A; Donovan B; Mant A; Bridges-Webb C Aust Fam Physician; 1984 Jun; 13(6):429-30. PubMed ID: 6487162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Use of Spreadsheets for Research Data Collection and Preparation: A Primer. Juluru K; Eng J Acad Radiol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1592-9. PubMed ID: 26454810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Writing a good read: strategies for representing qualitative data. Hall JM J Child Fam Nurs; 1999; 2(2):135-6. PubMed ID: 10639932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Guidelines for conducting community surveys on injuries and violence. McGee K; Sethi D; Peden M; Habibula S Inj Control Saf Promot; 2004 Dec; 11(4):303-6. PubMed ID: 15903167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Write an original paper. Lockey DJ; Baskett PJ J R Army Med Corps; 2001 Jun; 147(2):219-21. PubMed ID: 11464420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]