These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12715604)

  • 1. Establishing the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of NOC in an adult care nurse practitioner setting.
    Keenan G; Barkauskas V; Stocker J; Johnson M; Maas M; Moorhead S; Reed D
    Outcomes Manag; 2003; 7(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 12715604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nursing outcomes classification: a preliminary report of field testing.
    Maas ML; Reed D; Reeder KM; Kerr P; Specht J; Johnson M; Moorhead S
    Outcomes Manag; 2002; 6(3):112-9. PubMed ID: 12134374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nursing-sensitive outcome reliability testing in a tertiary care setting.
    Behrenbeck JG; Timm JA; Griebenow LK; Demmer KA
    Int J Nurs Terminol Classif; 2005; 16(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 15842313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterizing nurse practitioner practice by sampling patient encounters: an APRNet study.
    Deshefy-Longhi T; Swartz MK; Grey M
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2008 May; 20(5):281-7. PubMed ID: 18460169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Toward collecting a standardized nursing data set across the continuum: case of adult care nurse practitioner setting.
    Keenan G; Stocker J; Barkauskas V; Treder M; Heath C
    Outcomes Manag; 2003; 7(3):113-20. PubMed ID: 12881972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variations across field settings in the use of the indicators for nursing outcomes classification outcomes.
    Reed D; Moorhead S; Johnson M; Maas M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():758-60. PubMed ID: 17102367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nursing-sensitive care measures: a platform for value and vision.
    Smith AP
    Nurs Econ; 2007; 25(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17402680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of an instrument measuring Chinese adolescent beliefs and attitudes towards substance abuse.
    Fok MS; Tsang WY
    J Clin Nurs; 2005 Sep; 14(8):986-94. PubMed ID: 16102150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Translation and validation of the Nursing Outcomes Classification labels and definitions for acute care nursing in Iceland.
    Gudmundsdottir E; Delaney C; Thoroddsen A; Karlsson T
    J Adv Nurs; 2004 May; 46(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 15066110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nurse practitioner-patient discourse: uncovering the voice of nursing in primary care practice.
    Johnson R
    Sch Inq Nurs Pract; 1993; 7(3):143-57; discussion 159-63. PubMed ID: 8272676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity and reliability of an oncology critical care patient acuity tool.
    Marsee VD; Lovett RB; McMillan SC
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1995 Jul; 22(6):967-71. PubMed ID: 7567614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC)--from theory to practice in Israel.
    Kol Y; Jacobson O; Wieler S; Weiss D; Sadeh Z
    Outcomes Manag; 2003; 7(3):121-8. PubMed ID: 12881973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring individualized nursing care: assessment of reliability and validity of three scales.
    Suhonen R; Schmidt LA; Radwin L
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Jul; 59(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 17537199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of nursing-sensitive outcomes in persons with spinal cord impairment.
    Ralph SS; Mailey S; VanDyke Hayes K; Deneselya J; Kraft MR; Bachand JK
    SCI Nurs; 2003; 20(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 15005056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of nursing outcomes classification in home care settings.
    Keenan G; Stocker J; Barkauskas V; Johnson M; Maas M; Moorhead S; Reed D
    J Nurs Meas; 2003; 11(2):135-55. PubMed ID: 15274522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Evaluating the results of nursing care. From concept to practice].
    Soins; 1999; (637):15-7. PubMed ID: 10615167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluating the results of nursing care. Use of the results in 8 questions].
    Soins; 1999; (637):18-9. PubMed ID: 10615168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implementing the Nursing Outcomes Classification in a practice setting.
    Johnson M; Maas M
    Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract; 1998; 2(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 9775915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity and reliability of an oral care practice survey for the orally intubated adult critically ill patient.
    Feider LL; Mitchell P
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(5):374-7. PubMed ID: 19680163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Use of the WHODAS II with stroke patients and their relatives: reliability and inter-rater-reliability].
    Schlote A; Richter M; Wunderlich MT; Poppendick U; Möller C; Wallesch CW
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2008 Feb; 47(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 18247269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.