180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12715604)
1. Establishing the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of NOC in an adult care nurse practitioner setting.
Keenan G; Barkauskas V; Stocker J; Johnson M; Maas M; Moorhead S; Reed D
Outcomes Manag; 2003; 7(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 12715604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nursing outcomes classification: a preliminary report of field testing.
Maas ML; Reed D; Reeder KM; Kerr P; Specht J; Johnson M; Moorhead S
Outcomes Manag; 2002; 6(3):112-9. PubMed ID: 12134374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nursing-sensitive outcome reliability testing in a tertiary care setting.
Behrenbeck JG; Timm JA; Griebenow LK; Demmer KA
Int J Nurs Terminol Classif; 2005; 16(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 15842313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterizing nurse practitioner practice by sampling patient encounters: an APRNet study.
Deshefy-Longhi T; Swartz MK; Grey M
J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2008 May; 20(5):281-7. PubMed ID: 18460169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward collecting a standardized nursing data set across the continuum: case of adult care nurse practitioner setting.
Keenan G; Stocker J; Barkauskas V; Treder M; Heath C
Outcomes Manag; 2003; 7(3):113-20. PubMed ID: 12881972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Variations across field settings in the use of the indicators for nursing outcomes classification outcomes.
Reed D; Moorhead S; Johnson M; Maas M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():758-60. PubMed ID: 17102367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nursing-sensitive care measures: a platform for value and vision.
Smith AP
Nurs Econ; 2007; 25(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17402680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of an instrument measuring Chinese adolescent beliefs and attitudes towards substance abuse.
Fok MS; Tsang WY
J Clin Nurs; 2005 Sep; 14(8):986-94. PubMed ID: 16102150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Translation and validation of the Nursing Outcomes Classification labels and definitions for acute care nursing in Iceland.
Gudmundsdottir E; Delaney C; Thoroddsen A; Karlsson T
J Adv Nurs; 2004 May; 46(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 15066110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nurse practitioner-patient discourse: uncovering the voice of nursing in primary care practice.
Johnson R
Sch Inq Nurs Pract; 1993; 7(3):143-57; discussion 159-63. PubMed ID: 8272676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validity and reliability of an oncology critical care patient acuity tool.
Marsee VD; Lovett RB; McMillan SC
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1995 Jul; 22(6):967-71. PubMed ID: 7567614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC)--from theory to practice in Israel.
Kol Y; Jacobson O; Wieler S; Weiss D; Sadeh Z
Outcomes Manag; 2003; 7(3):121-8. PubMed ID: 12881973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring individualized nursing care: assessment of reliability and validity of three scales.
Suhonen R; Schmidt LA; Radwin L
J Adv Nurs; 2007 Jul; 59(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 17537199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of nursing-sensitive outcomes in persons with spinal cord impairment.
Ralph SS; Mailey S; VanDyke Hayes K; Deneselya J; Kraft MR; Bachand JK
SCI Nurs; 2003; 20(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 15005056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the reliability, validity, and sensitivity of nursing outcomes classification in home care settings.
Keenan G; Stocker J; Barkauskas V; Johnson M; Maas M; Moorhead S; Reed D
J Nurs Meas; 2003; 11(2):135-55. PubMed ID: 15274522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluating the results of nursing care. From concept to practice].
Soins; 1999; (637):15-7. PubMed ID: 10615167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluating the results of nursing care. Use of the results in 8 questions].
Soins; 1999; (637):18-9. PubMed ID: 10615168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Implementing the Nursing Outcomes Classification in a practice setting.
Johnson M; Maas M
Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract; 1998; 2(3):99-104. PubMed ID: 9775915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity and reliability of an oral care practice survey for the orally intubated adult critically ill patient.
Feider LL; Mitchell P
Nurs Res; 2009; 58(5):374-7. PubMed ID: 19680163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Use of the WHODAS II with stroke patients and their relatives: reliability and inter-rater-reliability].
Schlote A; Richter M; Wunderlich MT; Poppendick U; Möller C; Wallesch CW
Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2008 Feb; 47(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 18247269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
