BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12715765)

  • 1. User fees and medical device reviews.
    Lewis C
    FDA Consum; 2003; 37(2):18-9. PubMed ID: 12715765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FDA user fee and Modernisation Act.
    Donawa M
    Med Device Technol; 2002 Dec; 13(10):27-9. PubMed ID: 12575526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical device technology user fees.
    Bailey PG
    Med Device Technol; 2002 Sep; 13(7):37-8. PubMed ID: 12397834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Will new FDA rules hasten device approval?
    Hosp Mater Manage; 2003 Jul; 28(7):2, 16. PubMed ID: 12889277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. United States laws under review.
    Leahey M
    Med Device Technol; 2007; 18(3):44-5. PubMed ID: 17585722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. User fees and beyond--the FDA Safety and Innovation Act of 2012.
    Kramer DB; Kesselheim AS
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Oct; 367(14):1277-9. PubMed ID: 23034017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cosmetic medical devices and their FDA regulation.
    Newburger AE
    Arch Dermatol; 2006 Feb; 142(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 16490851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FDA user fees approved.
    Clin Pharm; 1993 Jan; 12(1):3. PubMed ID: 8428431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Watchdog group says "massive lobbying effort" by medical device industry threatens public health.
    Lenzer J
    BMJ; 2012 Feb; 344():e1521. PubMed ID: 22374926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FDA user fees and innovation.
    Somberg J
    Am J Ther; 2008; 15(2):97. PubMed ID: 18356626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Judicial review of FDA preemption determinations.
    Frost A
    Food Drug Law J; 1999; 54(3):367-88. PubMed ID: 11797704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Devices and the food and drug administration.
    Phillips SJ; Phillips RS
    Artif Organs; 2005 May; 29(5):363-5. PubMed ID: 15854210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clarification: 510k is premarket notification; it provides no patent or FDA approval.
    Burkhart CG
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2008 Feb; 7(2):105. PubMed ID: 18335644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pharmaceuticals and medical devices: medical devices.
    Chaps NA
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2009 Jan; ():1-23. PubMed ID: 19297720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FDA set to tighten guidelines on industry dissemination of information on unapproved uses of medical products.
    Lang L
    Gastroenterology; 2008 Apr; 134(4):905. PubMed ID: 18395067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. U.S. medical device reporting: who is responsible?
    Donawa M
    Med Device Technol; 2005 Apr; 16(3):27-9. PubMed ID: 15871421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An overview of FDA medical device regulation as it relates to deep brain stimulation devices.
    Peña C; Bowsher K; Costello A; De Luca R; Doll S; Li K; Schroeder M; Stevens T
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2007 Sep; 15(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 17894274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. User fees to fund faster reviews.
    Henkel J
    FDA Consum; 1993 Oct; 27(8):19-21. PubMed ID: 10129049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. FDA panel gives cautious signal to summit.
    Moretti M
    J Refract Corneal Surg; 1994; 10(6):613-4. PubMed ID: 7719529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The FDA and the spine surgeon.
    Ducker TB
    J Spinal Disord; 1999 Aug; 12(4):277-9. PubMed ID: 10451041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.