These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12715809)

  • 41. The evolution of a constitutional right to an abortion. Fashioned in the 1970s and secured in the 1980s.
    Ford N
    J Leg Med; 1983 Sep; 4(3):271-322. PubMed ID: 6355342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An unjust act: the schizophrenic state of maturity and culpability in juvenile justice and minor abortion rights law; recent trends in Virginia and nationally.
    Foxworth JM
    William Mary J Women Law; 2003; 9(3):495-533. PubMed ID: 15977329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Court to tackle abortion again after 5 years; parent notification case; in considering technical issues, justices rejoin a fractious debate.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 2005 May; ():A1, A17. PubMed ID: 15948341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Law, ethics, and abortion.
    Bayer R
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Aug; 2(4):564-9. PubMed ID: 2130954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Adolescents and abortion.
    Benshoof J; Camp T; Melton GB; Marecek J; Senderowitz J; Nyikos PJ
    Issues Sci Technol; 1991; 7(3):17-20. PubMed ID: 11645694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Withdrawal of treatment for minors in a persistent vegetative state: parents should decide.
    Massie AM
    Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):173-218. PubMed ID: 12645558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Parental involvement laws and fertility behavior.
    Levine PB
    J Health Econ; 2003 Sep; 22(5):861-78. PubMed ID: 12946463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The next abortion decision.
    N Y Times Web; 2005 Nov; ():A34. PubMed ID: 16450474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The impact of state abortion restrictions on minors' demand for abortions.
    Haas-Wilson D
    J Hum Resour; 1996; 31(1):140-58. PubMed ID: 11660452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Using bioethics discourse to determine when parents should make health care decisions for their children: is deference justified?
    Rosato JL
    Temple Law Rev; 2000; 73(1):1-68. PubMed ID: 12449931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Parental Notification/Consent for Treatment of the Adolescent.
    American College of Pediatricians
    Issues Law Med; 2015; 30(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 26103711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Minors need consent for abortion, Supreme Court rules.
    Ob Gyn News; 1979 Sep; 14(17):2+. PubMed ID: 11665034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Constitutional law: parental denial of a child's medical treatment for religious reasons.
    Trahan J
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1989; 1989(1):307-41. PubMed ID: 16594107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Scant drop seen in abortions if parents are told.
    Lehren A; Leland J
    N Y Times Web; 2006 Mar; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 16528886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Just what the doctor ordered: the role of unconventional therapy in the treatment of cancer in minors.
    Grumet BR
    Fam Law Q; 1980; 14(2):63-98. PubMed ID: 11665187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. Lawall.
    United States. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Wests Fed Rep; 1999; 180():1022-33. PubMed ID: 16477716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. North Florida Women's Health Services v. State.
    Florida. Supreme Court
    Wests South Report; 2003; 866():612-74. PubMed ID: 16479690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Assisting minors seeking abortions in judicial bypass proceedings: a guardian ad litem is no substitute for an attorney.
    Graybill ES
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002 Mar; 55(2):581-606. PubMed ID: 14986670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A wink from the bench: the federal courts and abortion.
    Uddo BJ
    Tulane Law Rev; 1979 Feb; 53(2):398-464. PubMed ID: 11665104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.