These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12715815)

  • 1. The abortion right, originalism, and the Fourteenth Amendment.
    Graines S; Wyatt J
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1999; 47(2):161-91. PubMed ID: 12715815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Equality theory and reproductive freedom.
    Colker R
    Tex J Women Law; 1994; 3(1):99-122. PubMed ID: 12645608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Supreme Court and abortion rights.
    Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2201-7. PubMed ID: 17476003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Winter count: taking stock of abortion rights after Casey and Carhart.
    Borgmann CE
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):675-716. PubMed ID: 16700116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Roe v. Wade and the common law: denying the blessings of liberty to our posterity.
    Roden GJ
    Univ West Los Angel Law Rev; 2003; 35():212-96. PubMed ID: 15568273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
    Van Detta JA
    South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud; 2001; 10(2):211-92. PubMed ID: 16485363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gaining a right to abortion in the United States and Canada: the role of judicial capacities.
    DeLorme L
    Berkeley J Sociol; 1991; 36():93-114. PubMed ID: 11656333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Partial-birth abortion: should moral judgment prevail over medical judgment?
    Walther KE
    Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 2000; 31(4):693-736. PubMed ID: 11962531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
    Burdick R
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1996; 23():825-76. PubMed ID: 16086482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation.
    Moses MF
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The phoenix of abortional freedom: is a penumbral or Ninth-Amendment right about to arise from the nineteenth-century legislative ashes of a fourteenth-century common-law liberty?
    Means CC
    N Y Law Forum; 1971; 17(2):335-410. PubMed ID: 16602212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Where privacy fails: equal protection and the abortion rights of minors.
    Schmidt CG
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 68(3):597-638. PubMed ID: 11659822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech, privacy, and the power of the purse: lessons from the abortion "gag rule" case.
    Wing KR
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1992; 17(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 1619248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stenberg v Carhart: a divided US Supreme Court debates partial birth abortion.
    Heffernan L
    Mod Law Rev; 2001 Jul; 64(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 16538739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproductive self-determination in the Third Circuit: the statutory proscription of wrongful birth and wrongful life claims as an unconstitutional violation of Planned Parenthood v. Casey's undue burden standard.
    Intromasso C
    Womens Rights Law Report; 2003; 24(2):101-20. PubMed ID: 15568248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests.
    Jones CJ
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape.
    Baron CH
    Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 2628652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New York v. Sullivan: shhh ... don't say the "a" word! Another outcome-oriented abortion decision.
    Kendall CC
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1990; 23(4):753-70. PubMed ID: 16622962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute.
    Gough AD
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1998; 24(1):187-214. PubMed ID: 12774818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The unborn and the born again.
    New Repub; 1977 Jul; 177(27):5-6+. PubMed ID: 11663777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.