These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12715840)
1. Clinical evaluation of peak endocardial acceleration as a sensor for rate responsive pacing. Greco EM; Ferrario M; Romano S Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2003 Apr; 26(4 Pt 1):812-8. PubMed ID: 12715840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How to program rate responsive pacemakers. Greco EM; Guardini S; Ferrario M; Romano S Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Feb; 23(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 10709224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [An intrapatient comparison of adaptation to aerobic and anaerobic exertion during 3 types of physiological cardiac stimulation in chronotropic failure of the sinus node: DDD, VVIR and DDDR]. Occhetta E; Perucca A; Fazzari M; Pistis G; Baduini G; Trevi G Cardiologia; 1997 Jan; 42(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9118155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dual chamber rate responsive pacing system driven by contractility: final assessment after 1-year follow-up. The European PEA Clinical Investigation Group. Clémenty J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 2):2192-7. PubMed ID: 9825317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life]. Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-year experience with rate-modulated pacing controlled by mixed venous oxygen saturation. Windecker S; Bubien RS; Halperin L; Moore A; Kay GN Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Jul; 21(7):1396-404. PubMed ID: 9670183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective multicenter study demonstrating clinical benefit with a new accelerometer-based DDDR pacemaker. Dromos Dr Investigators Group. Lazarus A; Mitchell K Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1694-7. PubMed ID: 8945026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of the pacing rate on the atrioventricular conduction time during aerobic and anaerobic exercise: basic concepts for a dromotropically controlled rate responsive pacemaker. Meine M; Hexamer M; Werner J; Israel CW; Mügge A; Lemke B; Barmeyer J Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Dec; 22(12):1782-91. PubMed ID: 10642132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multicenter clinical evaluation of a new SSIR pacemaker. Bongiorni MG; Soldati E; Arena G; de Simone L; Capucci A; Galli R; Parlapiano M; Cazzin R; Moracchini P; Leonardi C Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1798-803. PubMed ID: 1279550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation by cardiopulmonary exercise test of DDDR versus DDD pacing. Capucci A; Boriani G; Specchia S; Marinelli M; Santarelli A; Magnani B Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1992 Nov; 15(11 Pt 2):1908-13. PubMed ID: 1279570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Peak endocardial acceleration-based clinical testing of the "BEST" DDDR pacemaker. European PEA Clinical Investigation Group. Langenfeld H; Krein A; Kirstein M; Binner L Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 2):2187-91. PubMed ID: 9825316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automatic optimization of resting and exercise atrioventricular interval using a peak endocardial acceleration sensor: validation with Doppler echocardiography and direct cardiac output measurements. Leung SK; Lau CP; Lam CT; Ho S; Tse HF; Yu CM; Lee K; Tang MO; To KM; Renesto F Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Nov; 23(11 Pt 2):1762-6. PubMed ID: 11139919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study. Vardas PE; Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Skalidis EI; Zuridakis EG Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rate modulated pacing based on right ventricular dP/dt: quantitative analysis of chronotropic response. Kay GN; Philippon F; Bubien RS; Plumb VJ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Aug; 17(8):1344-54. PubMed ID: 7971396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life. Lau CP; Tai YT; Leung WH; Wong CK; Lee P; Chung FL Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can current minute ventilation rate adaptive pacemakers provide appropriate chronotropic response in pediatric patients? Cabrera ME; Portzline G; Aach S; Condie C; Dorostkar P; Mianulli M Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2002 Jun; 25(6):907-14. PubMed ID: 12137342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of normal sinus rhythm and pacing rate in children with minute ventilation single chamber rate adaptive permanent pacemakers. Celiker A; Ceviz N; Alehan D; Lenk MK; Ozme S Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 1):2100-4. PubMed ID: 9826863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Addition of minute ventilation to rate-response pacing improves heart rate score more than accelerometer alone. Richards M; Olshansky B; Sharma AD; Wold N; Jones P; Perschbacher D; Wilkoff BL Heart Rhythm; 2018 Nov; 15(11):1730-1735. PubMed ID: 29908371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]