These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12716002)

  • 1. Quantitative comparison of FBP, EM, and Bayesian reconstruction algorithms for the IndyPET scanner.
    Frese T; Rouze NC; Bouman CA; Sauer K; Hutchins GD
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):258-76. PubMed ID: 12716002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimisation of the OS-EM algorithm and comparison with FBP for image reconstruction on a dual-head camera: a phantom and a clinical 18F-FDG study.
    Gutman F; Gardin I; Delahaye N; Rakotonirina H; Hitzel A; Manrique A; Le Guludec D; Véra P
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Nov; 30(11):1510-9. PubMed ID: 14579091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.
    Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Swensson R; Comtat C; Lin M; Villemagne V; Trébossen R
    J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):276-90. PubMed ID: 12571221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian image reconstruction for emission tomography based on median root prior.
    Alenius S; Ruotsalainen U
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1997 Mar; 24(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 9143462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of parametric FBP and OS-EM reconstruction algorithm images for PET dynamic study.
    Oda K; Toyama H; Uemura K; Ikoma Y; Kimura Y; Senda M
    Ann Nucl Med; 2001 Oct; 15(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 11758946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. OS-EM and FBP reconstructions at low count rates: effect on 3D PET studies of [11C] WAY-100635.
    Bélanger MJ; Mann JJ; Parsey RV
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jan; 21(1):244-50. PubMed ID: 14741662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 2D linear and iterative reconstruction algorithms for a PET-insert scanner.
    Pal D; O'sullivan JA; Wu H; Janecek M; Tai YC
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4293-310. PubMed ID: 17664609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A study of lesion contrast recovery for iterative PET image reconstructions versus filtered backprojection using an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom.
    Hsu CH
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2002; 26(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 11818190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correction of photon attenuation and collimator response for a body-contouring SPECT/CT imaging system.
    Seo Y; Wong KH; Sun M; Franc BL; Hawkins RA; Hasegawa BH
    J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):868-77. PubMed ID: 15872362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pinhole single-photon emission tomography reconstruction based on median root prior.
    Sohlberg A; Kuikka JT; Ruotsalainen U
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Feb; 30(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 12552339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Optimization of PET image quality by means of 3D data acquisition and iterative image reconstruction].
    Doll J; Zaers J; Trojan H; Bellemann ME; Adam LE; Haberkorn U; Brix G
    Nuklearmedizin; 1998 Mar; 37(2):62-7. PubMed ID: 9547752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A penalized-likelihood image reconstruction method for emission tomography, compared to postsmoothed maximum-likelihood with matched spatial resolution.
    Nuyts J; Fessler JA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Sep; 22(9):1042-52. PubMed ID: 12956260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of lesion detectability in Bayesian emission reconstruction with nonstationary object variability.
    Qi J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Mar; 23(3):321-9. PubMed ID: 15027525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of different types of commercial filtered backprojection and ordered-subset expectation maximization SPECT reconstruction software.
    Seret A; Forthomme J
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2009 Sep; 37(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 19726808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling.
    Boellaard R; van Lingen A; Lammertsma AA
    J Nucl Med; 2001 May; 42(5):808-17. PubMed ID: 11337581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative assessment of lesion detection accuracy, resolution, and reconstruction algorithms in neutron stimulated emission computed tomography.
    Lakshmanan MN; Kapadia AJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Jul; 31(7):1426-35. PubMed ID: 22481814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance evaluation of filtered backprojection reconstruction and iterative reconstruction methods for PET images.
    Wang CX; Snyder WE; Bilbro G; Santago P
    Comput Biol Med; 1998 Jan; 28(1):13-24; discussion 24-5. PubMed ID: 9644571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical implications of different image reconstruction parameters for interpretation of whole-body PET studies in cancer patients.
    Schöder H; Erdi YE; Chao K; Gonen M; Larson SM; Yeung HW
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Apr; 45(4):559-66. PubMed ID: 15073250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Qualitative and quantitative comparison between images obtained with filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction in prostate cancer lesions of (18)F-FDG PET.
    Etchebehere EC; Macapinlac HA; Gonen M; Humm K; Yeung HW; Akhurst T; Scher HI; Larson SM
    Q J Nucl Med; 2002 Jun; 46(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 12114875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reconstruction of 2D PET data with Monte Carlo generated system matrix for generalized natural pixels.
    Vandenberghe S; Staelens S; Byrne CL; Soares EJ; Lemahieu I; Glick SJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(12):3105-25. PubMed ID: 16757866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.