137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12716320)
1. Randomized, prospective, double-blind comparison of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy in women without uterovaginal prolapse.
Miskry T; Magos A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Apr; 82(4):351-8. PubMed ID: 12716320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomized pilot study.
Rahmanou P; Price N; Jackson SR
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1687-94. PubMed ID: 26142347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vaginal versus abdominal hysterectomy for the enlarged non-prolapsed uterus: a retrospective cohort study.
Fatania K; Vithayathil M; Newbold P; Yoong W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Mar; 174():111-4. PubMed ID: 24412144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: a randomized clinical trial.
Benassi L; Rossi T; Kaihura CT; Ricci L; Bedocchi L; Galanti B; Vadora E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 187(6):1561-5. PubMed ID: 12501064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility of prophylactic salpingectomy during vaginal hysterectomy.
Antosh DD; High R; Brown HW; Oliphant SS; Abed H; Philip N; Grimes CL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):605.e1-605.e5. PubMed ID: 28734829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy.
Falcone T; Paraiso MF; Mascha E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Apr; 180(4):955-62. PubMed ID: 10203664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases: a prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial (LAVA).
Eggemann H; Ignatov A; Frauchiger-Heuer H; Amse T; Costa SD
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Feb; 297(2):479-485. PubMed ID: 29302807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hysterectomy in Denmark 1977-2011: changes in rate, indications, and hospitalization.
Lykke R; Blaakær J; Ottesen B; Gimbel H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):333-8. PubMed ID: 24094821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic vs vaginal hysterectomy for benign pathology.
Candiani M; Izzo S; Bulfoni A; Riparini J; Ronzoni S; Marconi A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Apr; 200(4):368.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19136094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The availability of vaginal hysterectomy in benign gynecologic diseases: a prospective, non-randomized trial.
Guvenal T; Ozsoy AZ; Kilcik MA; Yanik A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Aug; 36(4):832-7. PubMed ID: 20666953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Vaginal hysterectomy:apropos of a series of 1008 interventions].
Cravello L; Bretelle F; Cohen D; Roger V; Giuly J; Blanc B
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2001 Apr; 29(4):288-94. PubMed ID: 11338133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical indications for hysterectomy route: patient characteristics or physician preference?
Dorsey JH; Steinberg EP; Holtz PM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 173(5):1452-60. PubMed ID: 7503184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advanced uterovaginal prolapse: is vaginal hysterectomy with McCall culdoplasty as effective as in lesser degrees of prolapse?
Alas A; Chandrasekaran N; Devakumar H; Martin L; Hurtado E; Davila GW
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jan; 29(1):139-144. PubMed ID: 28779416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Surgical treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse at the Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of Kaunas University of Medicine].
Aniuliene R; Stankeviciene A; Kacerauskiene J; Aniulis P; Druktenyte V
Medicina (Kaunas); 2009; 45(6):440-6. PubMed ID: 19605963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy.
Nezhat F; Nezhat C; Gordon S; Wilkins E
J Reprod Med; 1992 Mar; 37(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 1532990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does medical debulking with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist facilitate vaginal hysterectomy with a moderate enlarged uterus? A randomized control study.
Elzaher MA; Moawad A; Madkour WA; Ali M; Salah Eldin Abdel Hamid AM; Zaheer H
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Jul; 169(2):326-30. PubMed ID: 23537617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changing the route of hysterectomy: the results of a policy of attempting the vaginal approach in all cases of dysfunctional uterine bleeding.
Oláh KS; Khalil M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Apr; 125(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 16226367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes after total versus subtotal abdominal hysterectomy.
Thakar R; Ayers S; Clarkson P; Stanton S; Manyonda I
N Engl J Med; 2002 Oct; 347(17):1318-25. PubMed ID: 12397189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
