These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

423 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12717029)

  • 1. Can correct protein models be identified?
    Wallner B; Elofsson A
    Protein Sci; 2003 May; 12(5):1073-86. PubMed ID: 12717029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic consensus-based fold recognition using Pcons, ProQ, and Pmodeller.
    Wallner B; Fang H; Elofsson A
    Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():534-41. PubMed ID: 14579343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining evolutionary and structural information for local protein structure prediction.
    Pei J; Grishin NV
    Proteins; 2004 Sep; 56(4):782-94. PubMed ID: 15281130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of global and local model quality in CASP8 using Pcons and ProQ.
    Larsson P; Skwark MJ; Wallner B; Elofsson A
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():167-72. PubMed ID: 19544566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protein secondary structure prediction with dihedral angles.
    Wood MJ; Hirst JD
    Proteins; 2005 May; 59(3):476-81. PubMed ID: 15778963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction of global and local model quality in CASP7 using Pcons and ProQ.
    Wallner B; Elofsson A
    Proteins; 2007; 69 Suppl 8():184-93. PubMed ID: 17894353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pcons: a neural-network-based consensus predictor that improves fold recognition.
    Lundström J; Rychlewski L; Bujnicki J; Elofsson A
    Protein Sci; 2001 Nov; 10(11):2354-62. PubMed ID: 11604541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pcons5: combining consensus, structural evaluation and fold recognition scores.
    Wallner B; Elofsson A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4248-54. PubMed ID: 16204344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Network properties of decoys and CASP predicted models: a comparison with native protein structures.
    Chatterjee S; Ghosh S; Vishveshwara S
    Mol Biosyst; 2013 Jul; 9(7):1774-88. PubMed ID: 23694935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protein structure evaluation using an all-atom energy based empirical scoring function.
    Narang P; Bhushan K; Bose S; Jayaram B
    J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2006 Feb; 23(4):385-406. PubMed ID: 16363875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pcons.net: protein structure prediction meta server.
    Wallner B; Larsson P; Elofsson A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W369-74. PubMed ID: 17584798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protein contact prediction using patterns of correlation.
    Hamilton N; Burrage K; Ragan MA; Huber T
    Proteins; 2004 Sep; 56(4):679-84. PubMed ID: 15281121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimized distance-dependent atom-pair-based potential DOOP for protein structure prediction.
    Chae MH; Krull F; Knapp EW
    Proteins; 2015 May; 83(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 25693513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protein secondary structure prediction with SPARROW.
    Bettella F; Rasinski D; Knapp EW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Feb; 52(2):545-56. PubMed ID: 22224407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 3D-SHOTGUN: a novel, cooperative, fold-recognition meta-predictor.
    Fischer D
    Proteins; 2003 May; 51(3):434-41. PubMed ID: 12696054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of protein tertiary structure using PROFESY, a novel method based on fragment assembly and conformational space annealing.
    Lee J; Kim SY; Joo K; Kim I; Lee J
    Proteins; 2004 Sep; 56(4):704-14. PubMed ID: 15281124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.
    Felts AK; Gallicchio E; Wallqvist A; Levy RM
    Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(2):404-22. PubMed ID: 12112706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimizing physical energy functions for protein folding.
    Fujitsuka Y; Takada S; Luthey-Schulten ZA; Wolynes PG
    Proteins; 2004 Jan; 54(1):88-103. PubMed ID: 14705026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting protein complex geometries with a neural network.
    Chae MH; Krull F; Lorenzen S; Knapp EW
    Proteins; 2010 Mar; 78(4):1026-39. PubMed ID: 19938153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A "FRankenstein's monster" approach to comparative modeling: merging the finest fragments of Fold-Recognition models and iterative model refinement aided by 3D structure evaluation.
    Kosinski J; Cymerman IA; Feder M; Kurowski MA; Sasin JM; Bujnicki JM
    Proteins; 2003; 53 Suppl 6():369-79. PubMed ID: 14579325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.