These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1271777)

  • 1. The use of auditory masking to estimate automatization of correct articulatory production.
    Manning WH; Keappock NE; Stick SL
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1976 May; 41(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 1271777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatization of correct production at two levels of articulatory acquisition.
    Manning WH; Wittstruck ML; Loyd RR; Campbell TF
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1977 Aug; 42(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 881817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A right-ear effect for auditory feedback control of children's newly acquired phonemes.
    Manning WH; Louko LJ; DiSalvo VS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Sep; 21(3):580-8. PubMed ID: 713524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using competing speech to estimate articulatory automatization in children: the possible effect of masking level and subject grade.
    Manning WH; Scheer BR
    J Commun Disord; 1978 Sep; 11(5):391-7. PubMed ID: 730832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Articulatory-defective children's discrimination of their production errors.
    McReynolds LV; Kohn J; Williams GC
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1975 Aug; 40(3):327-38. PubMed ID: 1234946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lombard and sidetone amplification effects in normal and misarticulating children.
    Siegel GM; Kennard KL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 6717007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of auditory masking to estimate automatization of correct articulation in children. The effect of masking type.
    Manning WH; Ortman KJ
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1980; 32(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 7380370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory backward-masking performance by children who stutter and its relation to dysfluency rate.
    Howell P; Rosen S; Hannigan G; Rustin L
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Apr; 90(2):355-63. PubMed ID: 10833723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing speech perception in Swedish school-aged children: preliminary data on the Listen-Say test.
    Nakeva von Mentzer C; Sundström M; Enqvist K; Hällgren M
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Oct; 43(3):106-119. PubMed ID: 28994616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between discrimination and articulation training in children with misarticulations.
    Williams GC; McReynolds LV
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):401-12. PubMed ID: 1102779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intelligibility characteristics of superior esophageal speech presented under various levels of masking noise.
    Horii Y; Weinberg B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 1186150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of motor-based speech intervention on articulatory placement in the treatment of a posterior nasal fricative: a preliminary MRI study on a single subject.
    Mason KN; Pua E; Perry JL
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2018 Jul; 53(4):852-863. PubMed ID: 29781570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interaction of sensory feedback: a child-adult comparison of oral sensory and temporal articulatory function.
    Crary MA; Fucci DJ; Bond ZS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Dec; 53(3):979-88. PubMed ID: 7322793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The Oldenburg children's rhyme test during speech simulating noise disturbance (Regensburg variant). Modification of the test and normal values for the ages 7-10 years].
    Steffens T
    HNO; 2003 Dec; 51(12):1012-8. PubMed ID: 14647933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interaction between auditory and oral sensory feedback in speech regulation.
    Fucci D; Crary MA; Warren JA; Bond ZS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Aug; 45(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 905073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory Training Effects on the Listening Skills of Children With Auditory Processing Disorder.
    Loo JH; Rosen S; Bamiou DE
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 26418044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of auditory masking by white noise on primary stressing during spontaneous speech.
    Colcord RD; Loren CA; Rastatter M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Dec; 63(3):1217-8. PubMed ID: 3808897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Articulatory Fo perturbations and auditory feedback.
    Ternström S; Sundberg J; Colldén A
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Jun; 31(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 3398492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Susceptibility to intraspeech spread of masking in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Hannley M; Dorman MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jul; 74(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 6886197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Error monitoring in people who stutter: evidence against auditory feedback defect theories.
    Postma A; Kolk H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Oct; 35(5):1024-32. PubMed ID: 1447913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.