These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1272089)

  • 1. Transthoracic impedance to direct current discharge: effect of repeated countershocks.
    Dahl CF; Ewy GA; Ewy MD; Thomas ED
    Med Instrum; 1976; 10(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 1272089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Disposable defibrillator electrodes.
    Ewy GA; Horan WJ; Ewy MD
    Heart Lung; 1977; 6(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 583893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impedance to transthoracic direct current discharge: a model for testing interface material.
    Ewy GA; Taren D
    Med Instrum; 1978; 12(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 634191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The prediction of the impedance of the thorax to defibrillating current.
    Geddes LA; Tacker WA; Schoenlein W; Minton M; Grubbs S; Wilcox P
    Med Instrum; 1976; 10(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 1272091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determining transthoracic impedance, delivered energy, and peak current during defibrillation episodes.
    Jones VC; Charbonnier FM; Long P
    Med Instrum; 1981; 15(6):380-2. PubMed ID: 7339468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relative contribution of paddle electrode area and edge length to transthoracic impedance from a dc defibrillator discharge.
    Taren D; Ewy GA
    Med Instrum; 1979; 13(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 440179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between canine transthoracic impedance and defibrillation threshold. Evidence for current-based defibrillation.
    Lerman BB; Halperin HR; Tsitlik JE; Brin K; Clark CW; Deale OC
    J Clin Invest; 1987 Sep; 80(3):797-803. PubMed ID: 3624489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated impedance-based energy adjustment for defibrillation: experimental studies.
    Kerber RE; McPherson D; Charbonnier F; Kieso R; Hite P
    Circulation; 1985 Jan; 71(1):136-40. PubMed ID: 3964715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of application of force to self-adhesive defibrillator pads on transthoracic electrical impedance and countershock success.
    Persse DE; Dzwonczyk R; Brown CG
    Ann Emerg Med; 1999 Aug; 34(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 10424911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intracardiac voltage gradients during transthoracic defibrillation: implications for postshock myocardial injury.
    Niemann JT; Walker RG; Rosborough JP
    Acad Emerg Med; 2005 Feb; 12(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15692128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quadriphasic waveforms are superior to triphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in a cardiac arrest swine model with high impedance.
    Zhang Y; Rhee B; Davies LR; Zimmerman MB; Snyder D; Jones JL; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 2006 Feb; 68(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 16325983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of ventilation phase on transthoracic impedance and defibrillation effectiveness.
    Ewy GA; Hellman DA; McClung S; Taren D
    Crit Care Med; 1980 Mar; 8(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 7363632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design for a constant peak current defibrillator.
    Machin JW; Brownhill J; Furness A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Jul; 37(7):723-30. PubMed ID: 2394461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors determining success and energy requirements for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: revised version.
    Dalzell GW; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    Q J Med; 1991 Jan; 78(285):85-95. PubMed ID: 1670068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of five different defibrillators using recommended energy protocols.
    Zelinka M; Buić D; Zelinka I
    Resuscitation; 2007 Sep; 74(3):500-7. PubMed ID: 17466431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors determining success and energy requirements for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
    Dalzell GW; Anderson J; Adgey AA
    Q J Med; 1990 Sep; 76(281):903-13. PubMed ID: 2236476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calibrated current divider network for precision current delivery during high-voltage transthoracic defibrillation.
    Deale OC; Ng KT; Lerman BB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Nov; 52(11):1970-3. PubMed ID: 16285402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Myocardial injury from transthoracic defibrillator countershock.
    Warner ED; Dahl C; Ewy GA
    Arch Pathol; 1975 Jan; 99(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 1111497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Changes in transthoracic impedance during sequential biphasic defibrillation.
    Deakin CD; Ambler JJ; Shaw S
    Resuscitation; 2008 Aug; 78(2):141-5. PubMed ID: 18486297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Control of high common mode voltage during transthoracic defibrillation.
    Deale OC; Ng KT; Kim EJ; Lerman BB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Dec; 42(12):1208-11. PubMed ID: 8550063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.