These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1272089)

  • 21. Finite element models of thoracic conductive anatomy: sensitivity to changes in inhomogeneity and anisotropy.
    Karlon WJ; Lehr JL; Eisenberg SR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Nov; 41(11):1010-7. PubMed ID: 8001989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Possibilities for predictive measurement of the transthoracic impedance in defibrillation.
    Krasteva V; Hatib FA; Trendafilova E; Daskalov I
    J Med Eng Technol; 2001; 25(5):195-200. PubMed ID: 11695659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transthoracic impedance to defibrillator discharge. Effect of electrode size and electrode-chest wall interface.
    Connell PN; Ewy GA; Dahl CF; Ewy MD
    J Electrocardiol; 1973; 6(4):313-M. PubMed ID: 4765325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Transthoracic impedance study with large self-adhesive electrodes in two conventional positions for defibrillation.
    Krasteva V; Matveev M; Mudrov N; Prokopova R
    Physiol Meas; 2006 Oct; 27(10):1009-22. PubMed ID: 16951460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [A comparative study of contact media for defibrillation].
    Andersen C; Larsen B
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1989 Jul; 151(31):1987-8. PubMed ID: 2773114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pediatric defibrillation: importance of paddle size in determining transthoracic impedance.
    Atkins DL; Sirna S; Kieso R; Charbonnier F; Kerber RE
    Pediatrics; 1988 Dec; 82(6):914-8. PubMed ID: 3186384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A three-dimensional finite element model of human transthoracic defibrillation: paddle placement and size.
    Camacho MA; Lehr JL; Eisenberg SR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1995 Jun; 42(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 7790013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A percutaneous catheter-based system for the measurement of potential gradients applicable to the study of transthoracic defibrillation.
    Rosborough JP; Deno DC; Walker RG; Niemann JT
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb; 30(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 17338711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of hypothermia on transthoracic defibrillation in a swine model.
    Rhee BJ; Zhang Y; Boddicker KA; Davies LR; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 2005 Apr; 65(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 15797279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of myocardial infarction on catheter defibrillation threshold.
    Babbs CF; Paris RL; Tacker WA; Bourland JD
    Med Instrum; 1983; 17(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 6843409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Defibrillation probability and impedance change between shocks during resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Walker RG; Koster RW; Sun C; Moffat G; Barger J; Dodson PP; Chapman FW
    Resuscitation; 2009 Jul; 80(7):773-7. PubMed ID: 19423211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of direct-current countershocks on regional myocardial contractility and perfusion. Experimental studies.
    Kerber RE; Martins JB; Gascho JA; Marcus ML; Grayzel J
    Circulation; 1981 Feb; 63(2):323-32. PubMed ID: 7449055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intrathoracic current flow during transthoracic defibrillation in dogs. Transcardiac current fraction.
    Deale OC; Lerman BB
    Circ Res; 1990 Dec; 67(6):1405-19. PubMed ID: 2245502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effects of shock energy, propranolol, and verapamil on cardiac damage caused by transthoracic countershock.
    Patton JN; Allen JD; Pantridge JF
    Circulation; 1984 Feb; 69(2):357-68. PubMed ID: 6690102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of respiratory gas composition on transthoracic impedance.
    Deakin CD; McLaren RM; Pack LS; Petley GW; Clewlow F; Dalrymple-Hay MJ
    Resuscitation; 1998 Sep; 38(3):193-5. PubMed ID: 9872641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Automated precision current delivery: an alternative method for cardiac defibrillation.
    Zimmerman D; Farkhani F; Wesley RC
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Apr; 17(4 Pt 1):595-602. PubMed ID: 7516543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Transthoracic defibrillation: effect of sternotomy on chest impedance.
    Kerber RE; Vance S; Schomer SJ; Mariano DJ; Charbonnier F
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Jul; 20(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 1607545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do physiological changes in pregnancy change defibrillation energy requirements?
    Nanson J; Elcock D; Williams M; Deakin CD
    Br J Anaesth; 2001 Aug; 87(2):237-9. PubMed ID: 11493495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Relative impedance of gels to defibrillator discharge.
    Ewy GA; Taren D
    Med Instrum; 1979; 13(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 502929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of the effects of removal of chest hair with not doing so before external defibrillation on transthoracic impedance.
    Sado DM; Deakin CD; Petley GW; Clewlow F
    Am J Cardiol; 2004 Jan; 93(1):98-100. PubMed ID: 14697478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.