These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1272091)

  • 1. The prediction of the impedance of the thorax to defibrillating current.
    Geddes LA; Tacker WA; Schoenlein W; Minton M; Grubbs S; Wilcox P
    Med Instrum; 1976; 10(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 1272091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design for a constant peak current defibrillator.
    Machin JW; Brownhill J; Furness A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Jul; 37(7):723-30. PubMed ID: 2394461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disposable defibrillator electrodes.
    Ewy GA; Horan WJ; Ewy MD
    Heart Lung; 1977; 6(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 583893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Transthoracic impedance to direct current discharge: effect of repeated countershocks.
    Dahl CF; Ewy GA; Ewy MD; Thomas ED
    Med Instrum; 1976; 10(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 1272089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determining transthoracic impedance, delivered energy, and peak current during defibrillation episodes.
    Jones VC; Charbonnier FM; Long P
    Med Instrum; 1981; 15(6):380-2. PubMed ID: 7339468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated impedance-based energy adjustment for defibrillation: experimental studies.
    Kerber RE; McPherson D; Charbonnier F; Kieso R; Hite P
    Circulation; 1985 Jan; 71(1):136-40. PubMed ID: 3964715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advance prediction of transthoracic impedance in human defibrillation and cardioversion: importance of impedance in determining the success of low-energy shocks.
    Kerber RE; Kouba C; Martins J; Kelly K; Low R; Hoyt R; Ferguson D; Bailey L; Bennett P; Charbonnier F
    Circulation; 1984 Aug; 70(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 6733884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The measurement of cardia output by the thoracic impedance method.
    Adamicza A; Tutsek L; Nagy S
    Acta Physiol Hung; 1988; 71(3):395-408. PubMed ID: 3421117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite element models of thoracic conductive anatomy: sensitivity to changes in inhomogeneity and anisotropy.
    Karlon WJ; Lehr JL; Eisenberg SR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Nov; 41(11):1010-7. PubMed ID: 8001989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relative contribution of paddle electrode area and edge length to transthoracic impedance from a dc defibrillator discharge.
    Taren D; Ewy GA
    Med Instrum; 1979; 13(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 440179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quadriphasic waveforms are superior to triphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in a cardiac arrest swine model with high impedance.
    Zhang Y; Rhee B; Davies LR; Zimmerman MB; Snyder D; Jones JL; Kerber RE
    Resuscitation; 2006 Feb; 68(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 16325983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Possibilities for predictive measurement of the transthoracic impedance in defibrillation.
    Krasteva V; Hatib FA; Trendafilova E; Daskalov I
    J Med Eng Technol; 2001; 25(5):195-200. PubMed ID: 11695659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between canine transthoracic impedance and defibrillation threshold. Evidence for current-based defibrillation.
    Lerman BB; Halperin HR; Tsitlik JE; Brin K; Clark CW; Deale OC
    J Clin Invest; 1987 Sep; 80(3):797-803. PubMed ID: 3624489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impedance to transthoracic direct current discharge: a model for testing interface material.
    Ewy GA; Taren D
    Med Instrum; 1978; 12(1):47-8. PubMed ID: 634191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemodynamic responses to two defibrillating trapezoidal waveforms.
    Holmes HR; Bourland JD; Tacker WA; Geddes LA
    Med Instrum; 1980; 14(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 7354734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Finite element analysis of cardiac defibrillation current distributions.
    Sepulveda NG; Wikswo JP; Echt DS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1990 Apr; 37(4):354-65. PubMed ID: 2338348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Defibrillation probability and impedance change between shocks during resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Walker RG; Koster RW; Sun C; Moffat G; Barger J; Dodson PP; Chapman FW
    Resuscitation; 2009 Jul; 80(7):773-7. PubMed ID: 19423211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transthoracic impedance to defibrillator discharge. Effect of electrode size and electrode-chest wall interface.
    Connell PN; Ewy GA; Dahl CF; Ewy MD
    J Electrocardiol; 1973; 6(4):313-M. PubMed ID: 4765325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated precision current delivery: an alternative method for cardiac defibrillation.
    Zimmerman D; Farkhani F; Wesley RC
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Apr; 17(4 Pt 1):595-602. PubMed ID: 7516543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Skeletal muscle grids for assessing current distributions from defibrillation shocks.
    Schmidt J; Gatlin B; Eason J; Koomullil G; Pilkington T
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1992; 20(1-2):121-39. PubMed ID: 1424684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.