348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12721555)
1. Concerns over refuge size for US EPA-approved Bt corn.
Powell K
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):467-8. PubMed ID: 12721555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Agency 'ignoring its advisers' over Bt maize.
Knight J
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):5. PubMed ID: 12621399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Coexistence in the EU-return of the moratorium on GM crops?
Devos Y; Demont M; Sanvido O
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 26(11):1223-5. PubMed ID: 18997757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing Bt refuge strategies in the field.
Gould F
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Mar; 18(3):266-7. PubMed ID: 10700135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Withdrawn Greenpeace Bt suit enters spin cycle.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):920. PubMed ID: 10973201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Survey raises concerns about Bt resistance management.
Dove A
Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Apr; 19(4):293-4. PubMed ID: 11283558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Regulatory oversight in developing nations.
Dirie AM
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):547-8. PubMed ID: 12042849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Report claims no yield advantage for Bt crops.
Sheridan C
Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Jul; 27(7):588-9. PubMed ID: 19587654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rhône-Poulenc rounds up DeKalb and Monsanto.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Dec; 15(13):1332. PubMed ID: 9415877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Don't rely on Uncle Sam.
Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7035):807. PubMed ID: 15829921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pest resistance feared as farmers flout rules.
Clarke T
Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6945):116. PubMed ID: 12853913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. EPA biotech rule reviewed yet again.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 May; 17(5):415. PubMed ID: 10331783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Field tests on managing resistance to Bt-engineered plants.
Shelton AM; Tang JD; Roush RT; Metz TD; Earle ED
Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Mar; 18(3):339-42. PubMed ID: 10700153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monarch Bt-corn paper questioned.
Hodgson J
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Jul; 17(7):627. PubMed ID: 10409342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term evaluation of compliance with refuge requirements for Bt cotton.
Carrière Y; Ellers-Kirk C; Kumar K; Heuberger S; Whitlow M; Antilla L; Dennehy TJ; Tabashnik BE
Pest Manag Sci; 2005 Apr; 61(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 15714465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stray seeds had antibiotic-resistance genes.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7033):548. PubMed ID: 15800583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Why Bt cotton pays for small-scale producers in South Africa.
Morse S; Bennett R; Ismael Y
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 15060543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. US launches probe into sales of unapproved transgenic corn.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7032):423. PubMed ID: 15791213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Resistance to Bt toxin surprisingly absent from pests.
Fox JL
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):958-9. PubMed ID: 12949541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Aventis gets short shrift over release of modified corn.
Netting J
Nature; 2000 Nov; 408(6811):395. PubMed ID: 11100697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
