These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12721555)

  • 1. Concerns over refuge size for US EPA-approved Bt corn.
    Powell K
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 May; 21(5):467-8. PubMed ID: 12721555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Agency 'ignoring its advisers' over Bt maize.
    Knight J
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):5. PubMed ID: 12621399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coexistence in the EU-return of the moratorium on GM crops?
    Devos Y; Demont M; Sanvido O
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 26(11):1223-5. PubMed ID: 18997757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing Bt refuge strategies in the field.
    Gould F
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Mar; 18(3):266-7. PubMed ID: 10700135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Withdrawn Greenpeace Bt suit enters spin cycle.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Sep; 18(9):920. PubMed ID: 10973201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survey raises concerns about Bt resistance management.
    Dove A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Apr; 19(4):293-4. PubMed ID: 11283558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regulatory oversight in developing nations.
    Dirie AM
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jun; 20(6):547-8. PubMed ID: 12042849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Report claims no yield advantage for Bt crops.
    Sheridan C
    Nat Biotechnol; 2009 Jul; 27(7):588-9. PubMed ID: 19587654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rhône-Poulenc rounds up DeKalb and Monsanto.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Dec; 15(13):1332. PubMed ID: 9415877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Don't rely on Uncle Sam.
    Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7035):807. PubMed ID: 15829921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pest resistance feared as farmers flout rules.
    Clarke T
    Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6945):116. PubMed ID: 12853913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EPA biotech rule reviewed yet again.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 May; 17(5):415. PubMed ID: 10331783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Field tests on managing resistance to Bt-engineered plants.
    Shelton AM; Tang JD; Roush RT; Metz TD; Earle ED
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Mar; 18(3):339-42. PubMed ID: 10700153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monarch Bt-corn paper questioned.
    Hodgson J
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Jul; 17(7):627. PubMed ID: 10409342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term evaluation of compliance with refuge requirements for Bt cotton.
    Carrière Y; Ellers-Kirk C; Kumar K; Heuberger S; Whitlow M; Antilla L; Dennehy TJ; Tabashnik BE
    Pest Manag Sci; 2005 Apr; 61(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 15714465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stray seeds had antibiotic-resistance genes.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7033):548. PubMed ID: 15800583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why Bt cotton pays for small-scale producers in South Africa.
    Morse S; Bennett R; Ismael Y
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 15060543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. US launches probe into sales of unapproved transgenic corn.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7032):423. PubMed ID: 15791213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resistance to Bt toxin surprisingly absent from pests.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):958-9. PubMed ID: 12949541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aventis gets short shrift over release of modified corn.
    Netting J
    Nature; 2000 Nov; 408(6811):395. PubMed ID: 11100697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.