These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12721647)

  • 21. Response.
    Lee CI; Bassett LW; Lehman CD
    Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):999-1000. PubMed ID: 23550288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Response.
    Hooley RJ; Greenberg K; Stackhouse RM; Geisel J; Butler R; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):998-9. PubMed ID: 23550287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
    Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [X-ray diagnosis of non-palpable breast cancer and limited non-cancerous breast diseases].
    Zal'tsman IN
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1984 Aug; 29(8):79-86. PubMed ID: 6088937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical application of the BI-RADS final assessment to breast sonography in conjunction with mammography.
    Kim EK; Ko KH; Oh KK; Kwak JY; You JK; Kim MJ; Park BW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1209-15. PubMed ID: 18430833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Focal asymmetric densities seen at mammography: US and pathologic correlation.
    Samardar P; de Paredes ES; Grimes MM; Wilson JD
    Radiographics; 2002; 22(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 11796895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Analysis of the results of 137 subclinical breast lesions excisions. Value of ultrasonography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Jacob D; Brombart JC; Muller C; Lefèbvre C; Massa F; Depoerck A
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9091540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The role of epidemiological quality parameters in a mammography screening programme].
    Becker N
    Radiologe; 2006 Nov; 46(11):984-92. PubMed ID: 16177930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Factors influencing quality of mammograms].
    Loewe C; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2003; 115 Suppl 2():40-5. PubMed ID: 15518145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. High-quality mammography: information for referring providers. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.
    Clin Pract Guidel Quick Ref Guide Clin; 1994 Oct; (13):1-18. PubMed ID: 7920740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Quality assured images in mammographic screening. Assessment criteria as a basis for national guidelines].
    Ståhl M; Edström C
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Mar; 98(10):1097-101. PubMed ID: 11301976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Over-diagnosis in breast cancer screening.
    Møller H; Davies E
    BMJ; 2006 Mar; 332(7543):691-2. PubMed ID: 16517549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Patient navigation to improve follow-up of abnormal mammograms among disadvantaged women.
    Percac-Lima S; Ashburner JM; McCarthy AM; Piawah S; Atlas SJ
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2015 Feb; 24(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 25522246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Difficulties in implementing an organized screening program for breast cancer in Brazil with emphasis on diagnostic methods.
    Silva TB; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL; Jacobs LA; Shulman LN
    Rural Remote Health; 2013; 13(2):2321. PubMed ID: 23597169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Ultrasonography and mammography in breast cancer].
    Zaĭtsev AN; Vesnin AG; Semiglazov VF; Chernomordikova MF; Chebykin IA
    Vopr Onkol; 1994; 40(1-3):87-90. PubMed ID: 7701800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Breast screening: the use of consensus opinion for all recalls.
    Matcham NJ; Ridley NT; Taylor SJ; Cook JL; Scolding J
    Breast; 2004 Jun; 13(3):184-7. PubMed ID: 15177419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. False-positive mammographic imaging of a breast implant.
    Cucin R; Bard R
    N Y State J Med; 1993 Feb; 93(2):151-2. PubMed ID: 8455835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Mammography].
    Grégoire A; Bernard C; Lavallée G; Morin C; Philie M
    Union Med Can; 1992; 121(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 1413293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Ultrasound mammography: development, current status and limits].
    Hackelöer BJ; Duda V; Hüneke B; Lauth G; Bald R; Buchholz R
    Ultraschall Med; 1982 Sep; 3(3):94-108. PubMed ID: 9417618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [The quality of mammography scrutinized. Ongoing control mass screenings for breast cancer is necessary].
    Andersson I; Rydén S; Karlberg I
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(35):3106-9. PubMed ID: 7658762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.