BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12722806)

  • 1. IMRT dose shaping with regionally variable penalty scheme.
    Cotrutz C; Xing L
    Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):544-51. PubMed ID: 12722806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coverage optimized planning: probabilistic treatment planning based on dose coverage histogram criteria.
    Gordon JJ; Sayah N; Weiss E; Siebers JV
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):550-63. PubMed ID: 20229863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inverse treatment planning with adaptively evolving voxel-dependent penalty scheme.
    Yang Y; Xing L
    Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2839-44. PubMed ID: 15543792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using voxel-dependent importance factors for interactive DVH-based dose optimization.
    Cotrutz C; Xing L
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 May; 47(10):1659-69. PubMed ID: 12069085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Toward truly optimal IMRT dose distribution: inverse planning with voxel-specific penalty.
    Lougovski P; LeNoach J; Zhu L; Ma Y; Censor Y; Xing L
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Dec; 9(6):629-36. PubMed ID: 21070085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dose sculpting with generalized equivalent uniform dose.
    Wu Q; Djajaputra D; Liu HH; Dong L; Mohan R; Wu Y
    Med Phys; 2005 May; 32(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 15984690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
    Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response-probability volume histograms and iso-probability of response charts in treatment plan evaluation.
    Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Lopes Mdo C
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2382-97. PubMed ID: 21776773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated tangential beam irradiation for breast cancer.
    Li JS; Freedman GM; Price R; Wang L; Anderson P; Chen L; Xiong W; Yang J; Pollack A; Ma CM
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1023-31. PubMed ID: 15191288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical knowledge-based inverse treatment planning.
    Yang Y; Xing L
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Nov; 49(22):5101-17. PubMed ID: 15609561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
    Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. IMRT: improvement in treatment planning efficiency using NTCP calculation independent of the dose-volume-histogram.
    Grigorov GN; Chow JC; Grigorov L; Jiang R; Barnett RB
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1250-8. PubMed ID: 16752559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inverse treatment planning by physically constrained minimization of a biological objective function.
    Stavrev P; Hristov D; Warkentin B; Sham E; Stavreva N; Fallone BG
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2948-58. PubMed ID: 14655942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A sensitivity-guided algorithm for automated determination of IMRT objective function parameters.
    Zhang X; Wang X; Dong L; Liu H; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2935-44. PubMed ID: 16964872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitation of the a priori dosimetric capabilities of spatial points in inverse planning and its significant implication in defining IMRT solution space.
    Shou Z; Yang Y; Cotrutz C; Levy D; Xing L
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(7):1469-82. PubMed ID: 15798337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
    Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of geometrical and scoring grid resolution for Monte Carlo dose calculations for IMRT.
    De Smedt B; Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4005-19. PubMed ID: 16177526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Independent dosimetric calculation with inclusion of head scatter and MLC transmission for IMRT.
    Yang Y; Xing L; Li JG; Palta J; Chen Y; Luxton G; Boyer A
    Med Phys; 2003 Nov; 30(11):2937-47. PubMed ID: 14655941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inverse planning for functional image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Xing L; Cotrutz C; Hunjan S; Boyer AL; Adalsteinsson E; Spielman D
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Oct; 47(20):3567-78. PubMed ID: 12433120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speed and convergence properties of gradient algorithms for optimization of IMRT.
    Zhang X; Liu H; Wang X; Dong L; Wu Q; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1141-52. PubMed ID: 15191303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.