235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12723275)
1. Dodging a bullet. Rulings limit punitive damages, uphold arbitration.
Benko LB
Mod Healthc; 2003 Apr; 33(15):20. PubMed ID: 12723275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. High court to review arbitration ruling in RICO suit against HMOs.
Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Nov; ():8-10. PubMed ID: 12498020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Dulling the Pain of Future Damages: High Court Ruling Addresses Periodic Payments.
Berlin J
Tex Med; 2020 Sep; 116(9):44-45. PubMed ID: 33023285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aetna Health, Inc. v. Davila: Implications for public health policy.
Rosenbaum S; Teitelbaum J
Public Health Rep; 2004; 119(5):510-2. PubMed ID: 15313115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effective legal reform and the malpractice insurance crisis.
Anderson RE
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):343-55. PubMed ID: 15742580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A medical mistake.
Schmitt CH
US News World Rep; 2003 Jun 30-Jul 7; 134(23):24, 26-7. PubMed ID: 12858780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Trial and error. Medical courts, arbitration systems are among the ideas gaining attention as answers to the malpractice liability crisis.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2003 Sep; 33(36):26-9. PubMed ID: 14520833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. SCOTUS invalidates West Virginia blanket prohibition against arbitration.
West JC
J Healthc Risk Manag; 2012; 32(2):53-4. PubMed ID: 23162916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Are new liability caps working?
Carroll J
Manag Care; 2003 Feb; 12(2):14-6. PubMed ID: 12658849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical liability reform moves to forefront of health care debates.
Van Koevering M
Healthplan; 2003; 44(2):8, 10. PubMed ID: 12675002
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. To cap or not to cap. Medical community lobbies for limits on noneconomic damages.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2003 Mar; 33(12):10. PubMed ID: 12687996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Limiting damages for "pain and suffering" in medical malpractice.
Sloan FA
N C Med J; 2003; 64(4):191-4. PubMed ID: 12971246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Legal. Legal experiments.
Haugh R
Hosp Health Netw; 2005 Jul; 79(7):20, 22-3. PubMed ID: 16128312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Partnering for malpractice reform.
Belfiglio G
Healthplan; 2003; 44(2):12-6. PubMed ID: 12675003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Tort reform in medical malpractice.
Regan J; Hamer G; Wright A; White C
Tenn Med; 2004 Jul; 97(7):322-3. PubMed ID: 15359522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Debunking medical malpractice myths: unraveling the false premises behind "tort reform".
Boehm G
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):357-69. PubMed ID: 15742581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Contingency fee legal actions in the U.S.A.
Hershkowitz L
Med Health R I; 2005 Jan; 88(1):35. PubMed ID: 15779559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Constitutionality of malpractice non-economic damage cap.
Weber RD
Mich Med; 2003; 102(5):7-8. PubMed ID: 14520908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Problems with the administration of remittitur in medical malpractice cases. Does a solution exist?
Keane DB
J Leg Med; 2004 Mar; 25(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 15204914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An empirical and critical look at the current medical liability crisis.
Kinney ED
Front Health Serv Manage; 2003; 20(1):31-7; discussion 39-42. PubMed ID: 14510316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
