These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12723485)

  • 1. [A simple audiometry test of speech intelligibility in background noise].
    Garin P; Galle C
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2002; 123(4):219-24. PubMed ID: 12723485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The sentence intelligibility in different types of noise regarding people with a normal hearing ability.
    Vokál J; Dlouhá O
    Prague Med Rep; 2009; 110(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 19591379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Speech tests: application in individuals with noise induced hearing loss].
    Moreira RR; Ferreira Junior M
    Pro Fono; 2004; 16(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 15609584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a Danish speech intelligibility test.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(10):729-41. PubMed ID: 19626512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Utility and limitations of speech audiometry testing in the detection of occupational noise-induced hearing loss: a comparative study in two groups in the hospital setting].
    Babin E; Bequignon A; Goullet de Rugy M; Edy E; Moreau S; Izard JP; Valdazo A
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2002; 123(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 12723484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment.
    Dietz A; Buschermöhle M; Aarnisalo AA; Vanhanen A; Hyyrynen T; Aaltonen O; Löppönen H; Zokoll MA; Kollmeier B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 134(7):728-37. PubMed ID: 24807850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V; Cord MT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech intelligibility in difficult signal/noise circumstances.
    Kiukaanniemi H; Sorri M
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1988; 30():215-8. PubMed ID: 3227274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Discrimination and critical signal to noise ratio of normal and pathological hearing (author's transl)].
    von Wedel H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1977 Feb; 56(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 139521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children.
    Vaillancourt V; Laroche C; Giguère C; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 18349705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of an automated procedure for a Dutch sentence test for the measurement of the speech reception threshold in noise.
    Terband H; Drullman R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3225-34. PubMed ID: 19045806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disturbed speech intelligibility in noise despite a normal audiogram: a defect in temporal resolution?
    Rappaport JM; Phillips DP; Gulliver JM
    J Otolaryngol; 1993 Dec; 22(6):447-53. PubMed ID: 8158743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Active noise reduction audiometry: a prospective analysis of a new approach to noise management in audiometric testing.
    Bromwich MA; Parsa V; Lanthier N; Yoo J; Parnes LS
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Jan; 118(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 18043495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Vocals in silence and noise. A simple test of resistance of intelligibility in noisy environment].
    Elbaz P; Leca F; Elbaz EF; Miller P
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1992; 109(7):373-85. PubMed ID: 1303062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.