These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12723866)

  • 1. Response-restriction analysis: I. Assessment of activity preferences.
    Hanley GP; Iwata BA; Lindberg JS; Conners J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 12723866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response-restriction analysis: II. Alteration of activity preferences.
    Hanley GP; Iwata BA; Roscoe EM; Thompson RH; Lindberg JS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(1):59-76. PubMed ID: 12723867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments.
    DeLeon IG; Iwata BA; Roscoe EM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):475-84. PubMed ID: 9316260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Lerman DC; Iwata BA; Rainville B; Adelinis JD; Crosland K; Kogan J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):411-22. PubMed ID: 9316256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of activity preferences as a function of differential consequences.
    Hanley GP; Iwata BA; Lindberg JS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):419-35. PubMed ID: 10641298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A review of choice research with people with severe and profound developmental disabilities.
    Lancioni GE; O'Reilly MF; Emerson E
    Res Dev Disabil; 1996; 17(5):391-411. PubMed ID: 8878362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preference testing: a comparison of two presentation methods.
    Windsor J; Piché LM; Locke PA
    Res Dev Disabil; 1994; 15(6):439-55. PubMed ID: 7871232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Response allocation to concurrent fixed-ratio reinforcement schedules with work requirements by adults with mental retardation and typical preschool children.
    Cuvo AJ; Lerch LJ; Leurquin DA; Gaffaney TJ; Poppen RL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 9532750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of reinforcer consumption and magnitude on response rates during noncontingent reinforcement.
    Roscoe EM; Iwata BA; Rand MS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(4):525-39. PubMed ID: 14768670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emergence of reinforcer preference as a function of schedule requirements and stimulus similarity.
    DeLeon IG; Iwata BA; Goh HL; Worsdell AS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):439-49. PubMed ID: 9378681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative versus absolute reinforcement effects: implications for preference assessments.
    Roscoe EM; Iwata BA; Kahng S
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):479-93. PubMed ID: 10641302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A response-restriction analysis of stereotypy in adolescents with mental retardation: implications for applied behavior analysis.
    McEntee JE; Saunders RR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):485-506. PubMed ID: 9316261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating different values of effort and reinforcement parameters under concurrent- and single-operant arrangements.
    Lozy ED; Sy JR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 May; 52(2):516-533. PubMed ID: 30548587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An analysis of reinforcer substitutability using object manipulation and self-injury as competing responses.
    Shore BA; Iwata BA; DeLeon IG; Kahng S; Smith RG
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):21-41. PubMed ID: 9103985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Project deinstitutionalization: using extended evaluation to enable institutionalized severely developmentally disabled persons to demonstrate their vocational rehabilitation potential.
    Karan OC
    Int J Rehabil Res; 1981; 4(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 7216578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the displacement of leisure items by food during multiple-stimulus preference assessments.
    Bojak SL; Carr JE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):515-8. PubMed ID: 10641304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.
    Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hagopian LP; Bowman LG; Toole L
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 8881340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Motivation, vocational interests and job satisfaction of mentally retarded adults.
    Reiter S; Friedman L; Molcho M
    Int J Rehabil Res; 1985; 8(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 4008148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using pictures to assess reinforcers in individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Graff RB; Gibson L
    Behav Modif; 2003 Sep; 27(4):470-83. PubMed ID: 12971123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures.
    DeLeon IG; Iwata BA; Conners J; Wallace MD
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 10201108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.