297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12724867)
1. Simulation of intraluminal impedance.
al-Zaben A; Chandrasekar V
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():48-52. PubMed ID: 12724867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of esophagus status and catheter configuration on multiple intraluminal impedance measurements.
Al-Zaben A; Chandrasekar V
Physiol Meas; 2005 Jun; 26(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 15798298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Numerical investigations of intraluminal impedance.
al-Zaben A; Chandrasekar V
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():168-74. PubMed ID: 15133953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Simulation study of line electrode for electrical impedance tomography].
Wang Y; Sha H; Ren C
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 24(5):986-9. PubMed ID: 18027681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of human uterine cervical electrical impedance measurements derived using two tetrapolar probes of different sizes.
Gandhi SV; Walker DC; Brown BH; Anumba DO
Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Nov; 5():62. PubMed ID: 17125510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Design of electrode array for impedance measurement of lesions in arteries.
Cho S; Thielecke H
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S19-26. PubMed ID: 15798232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimum design of electrode structure and parameters in electrical impedance tomography.
Yan W; Hong S; Chaoshi R
Physiol Meas; 2006 Mar; 27(3):291-306. PubMed ID: 16462015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maxwell-Wagner relaxation in electrical imaging.
Korjenevsky AV
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S101-10. PubMed ID: 15798223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic electrical impedance imaging with the interacting multiple model scheme.
Kim KY; Kim BS; Kim MC; Kim S; Isaacson D; Newell JC
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S217-33. PubMed ID: 15798235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrical impedance tomography for piecewise constant domains using boundary element shape-based inverse solutions.
Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 May; 26(5):637-47. PubMed ID: 17518058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reconstruction of the shape of conductivity spectra using differential multi-frequency magnetic induction tomography.
Brunner P; Merwa R; Missner A; Rosell J; Hollaus K; Scharfetter H
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S237-48. PubMed ID: 16636414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the numerical accuracy of the impedance method.
Olree KS; Horch KW
Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 Sep; 28(6):454-62. PubMed ID: 17486604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of 1-lead and 2-lead electrode patterns in electrical impedance endotomography.
Fournier-Desseux A; Jossinet J
Physiol Meas; 2005 Aug; 26(4):337-49. PubMed ID: 15886430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new geometric factor for in situ resistivity measurement using four slender cylindrical electrodes.
Chong CE; Tan YL
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):594-602. PubMed ID: 18269995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of emboli in vessels using electrical impedance measurements--phantom and electrodes.
Nebuya S; Noshiro M; Brown BH; Smallwood RH; Milnes P
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S111-8. PubMed ID: 15798224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrical impedance tomography via filtered-back projection of fan current distribution: a numerical simulation.
De Simone BC; Siciliano R; Pachi' A; Cametti C; De Luca F
Bioelectromagnetics; 2002 Oct; 23(7):516-21. PubMed ID: 12224055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography: a topology optimization approach.
Mello LA; de Lima CR; Amato MB; Lima RG; Silva EC
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):531-40. PubMed ID: 18269988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-dimensional SPICE-linked multiresolution impedance method for low-frequency electromagnetic interactions.
Eberdt M; Brown PK; Lazzi G
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Jul; 50(7):881-9. PubMed ID: 12848356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of electrode geometry and cell location on single-cell impedance measurement.
Wang JW; Wang MH; Jang LS
Biosens Bioelectron; 2010 Feb; 25(6):1271-6. PubMed ID: 19926465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A probe for organ impedance measurement.
Paulson KS; Pidcock MK; McLeod CN
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Oct; 51(10):1838-44. PubMed ID: 15490831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
