These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12724867)

  • 21. Electrical bioimpedance readings increase with higher pressure applied to the measuring probe.
    González-Correa CA; Brown BH; Smallwood RH; Walker DC; Bardhan KD
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S39-47. PubMed ID: 15798245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A method for modelling and optimizing an electrical impedance tomography system.
    Hartinger AE; Gagnon H; Guardo R
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S51-64. PubMed ID: 16636420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A simple mathematical model for electric cell-substrate impedance sensing with extended applications.
    Xiao C; Luong JH
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2010 Mar; 25(7):1774-80. PubMed ID: 20096558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Induced current bio-impedance technique for monitoring bone mineral density--a simulation model.
    Katz S; Zlochiver S; Abboud S
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2006 Aug; 34(8):1332-42. PubMed ID: 16807787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of two- and four-electrode techniques to characterize blood impedance for the frequency range of 100 Hz to 100 MHz.
    Chang ZY; Pop GM; Meijer GM
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 55(3):1247-9. PubMed ID: 18334424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An attempt to model the human body as a communication channel.
    Wegmueller MS; Kuhn A; Froehlich J; Oberle M; Felber N; Kuster N; Fichtner W
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Oct; 54(10):1851-7. PubMed ID: 17926683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impedance analysis of cultured cells: a mean-field electrical response model for electric cell-substrate impedance sensing technique.
    Urdapilleta E; Bellotti M; Bonetto FJ
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2006 Oct; 74(4 Pt 1):041908. PubMed ID: 17155097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Induced current magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography.
    Ozparlak L; Ider YZ
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S289-305. PubMed ID: 15798242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Initial analysis of SAR from a cell phone inside a vehicle by numerical computation.
    Anzaldi G; Silva F; Fernández M; Quílez M; Riu PJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 May; 54(5):921-30. PubMed ID: 17518290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Induced current bio-impedance technique for monitoring cryosurgery procedure in a two-dimensional head model using generalized coordinate systems.
    Gergel A; Zlochiver S; Rosenfeld M; Abboud S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jul; 52(7):1361-5. PubMed ID: 16042004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cole electrical impedance model--a critique and an alternative.
    Grimnes S; Martinsen OG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):132-5. PubMed ID: 15651574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Direct reconstruction of tissue parameters from differential multifrequency EIT in vivo.
    Mayer M; Brunner P; Merwa R; Smolle-Jüttner FM; Maier A; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S93-101. PubMed ID: 16636423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modeled current distribution inside the normal and malignant human urothelium using finite element analysis.
    Keshtkar A; Keshtkar A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):733-8. PubMed ID: 18270011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modelling the electrical properties of bladder tissue--quantifying impedance changes due to inflammation and oedema.
    Walker DC; Smallwood RH; Keshtar A; Wilkinson BA; Hamdy FC; Lee JA
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Jun; 26(3):251-68. PubMed ID: 15798300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impedance characterization and modeling of electrodes for biomedical applications.
    Franks W; Schenker I; Schmutz P; Hierlemann A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jul; 52(7):1295-302. PubMed ID: 16041993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Elliptic cylinder geometry for distinguishability analysis in impedance tomography.
    Saka B; Yilmaz A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jan; 51(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 14723501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Distinguishability in impedance imaging.
    Cheney M; Isaacson D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Aug; 39(8):852-60. PubMed ID: 1505998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Monitoring of lung edema using focused impedance spectroscopy: a feasibility study.
    Mayer M; Brunner P; Merwa R; Scharfetter H
    Physiol Meas; 2005 Jun; 26(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 15798294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computation of intraluminal impedance.
    Al-Zaben A; Chandrasekar V
    Physiol Meas; 2004 Feb; 25(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 15005305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Two-electrode biopotential measurements: power line interference analysis.
    Spinelli EM; Mayosky MA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Aug; 52(8):1436-42. PubMed ID: 16119239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.