These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12724953)
41. The bioethics agenda and the Bush second term. Cohen E New Atlantis; 2004 Fall-2005 Winter; 7():11-8. PubMed ID: 15812948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. An ethical analysis of alternative methods to obtain pluripotent stem cells without destroying embryos. Mertes H; Pennings G; Van Steirteghem A Hum Reprod; 2006 Nov; 21(11):2749-55. PubMed ID: 16951428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Totipotent and differentiated cells: an ethical difference for therapeutic cloning? MacKellar C Biomed Ethics; 2000; 5(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 12755114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Stem cell research. Reports give green light in Australia, Israel. Dayton L; Vogel G Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5539):2367-8. PubMed ID: 11577208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Biotechnology and the future of humanity. Cameron NM J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2006; 22(2):413-23. PubMed ID: 17117704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Derivation of embryonic stem cells for cellular therapy: challenges and new strategies. Taupin P Med Sci Monit; 2006 Apr; 12(4):RA75-8. PubMed ID: 16572064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Misapplied ethical considerations: U.S. federal stem cell mandates lack global focus and market foresight. Fowler HL Cornell Int Law J; 2004; 36(3):521-44. PubMed ID: 16602208 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Can artificial parthenogenesis sidestep ethical pitfalls in human therapeutic cloning? An historical perspective. Fangerau H J Med Ethics; 2005 Dec; 31(12):733-5. PubMed ID: 16319240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Does 2009 mark a revival of embryonic stem cells?]. López Moratalla N Cuad Bioet; 2009; 20(70):471-85. PubMed ID: 19799485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Baby steps: new work shows the promise, and pitfalls, of embryonic stem-cell research. Economist; 2004 Jan; 370(8356):53-5. PubMed ID: 15058297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. In vitro fertilization and embryos: the need for international guidelines. Fiandaca S Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1998; 8(2):337-404. PubMed ID: 12465644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Human embryonic stem cell research debates: a confucian argument. Tsai DF J Med Ethics; 2005 Nov; 31(11):635-40. PubMed ID: 16269558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Human embryos, human ingenuity, and government policy. Hoedemaekers R Ethics Med; 2003; 19(2):75-84. PubMed ID: 15025112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Regulating stem-cell research and human cloning in an Australian context: an exercise in protecting the status of the human subject. Harvey O New Genet Soc; 2005; 24(2):125-35. PubMed ID: 16552928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Research ethics. The NIH draft guidelines on human stem cell research. Majumder MA; Cohen CB Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5935):1648-9. PubMed ID: 19556488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Embryonic stem cells research in Israel: a legal and ethical inquiry. Siegal G J Biolaw Bus; 2004; 7(4):10-3. PubMed ID: 15675089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Holding cell: why the cloning decision was wrong. Groopman J New Repub; 2002 Aug; 227(6-7):14-6. PubMed ID: 12666674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. From human genes to stem cells: new challenges for patent law? Caulfield TA Trends Biotechnol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 12628363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. In search of a real "Third Way" in process and outcome. Campbell AT Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(6):66-8; discussion W14-6. PubMed ID: 16282122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]