These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1272506)

  • 21. [Interaction of the functions of the cerebral hemispheres].
    Wyke MA
    Arch Neurobiol (Madr); 1983; 46(6):369-76. PubMed ID: 6367687
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Existence of competing modality dominances.
    Robinson CW; Chandra M; Sinnett S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1104-14. PubMed ID: 26832916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Immediate visual-spatial memory in hemisphere-damaged patients: impairment of verbal coding and of perceptual processing.
    Gainotti G; Caltagirone C; Miceli G
    Neuropsychologia; 1978; 16(4):501-7. PubMed ID: 692862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. State-dependent variations in brainstem auditory evoked responses in human subjects.
    Sersen EA; Majkowski J; Clausen J; Heaney GM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Dec; 59(3):731-8. PubMed ID: 6522189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hemispheric asymmetries of visual and auditory information processing.
    Davis AE; Wada JA
    Neuropsychologia; 1977; 15(6):799-806. PubMed ID: 600375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Functional asymmetry of the human brain in the recognition of faces.
    Berent S
    Neuropsychologia; 1977; 15(6):829-31. PubMed ID: 600377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dichotic studies. II. Two questions.
    Studdert-Kennedy M
    Brain Lang; 1975 Apr; 2(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 1102062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of bilateral lesions of auditory cortex in mice on the acoustic startle response.
    Hunter KP; Willott JF
    Physiol Behav; 1993 Dec; 54(6):1133-9. PubMed ID: 8295953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of ipsilateral and contralateral auditory pathways in callosum-sectioned patients by use of a response-time technique.
    Gordon HW
    Neuropsychologia; 1975 Jan; 13(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 1109466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reactivity to heteromodal stimulation as a function of stimulus intensity and inner arousal.
    Alexander R; Epstein S
    Psychophysiology; 1978 Sep; 15(5):387-93. PubMed ID: 693750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Unimanual reaction time during comparison of lateralized verbal stimuli: the features of interhemispheric interactions related to subjects gender].
    Vol'f NV; Razumnikova OM
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2002; 28(4):21-5. PubMed ID: 12187876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis of click-evoked brainstem auditory electric potentials using high-pass noise masking and its clinical application.
    Eggermont JJ; Don M
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982; 388():471-86. PubMed ID: 6284001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of dichotic, monaural and diotic verbal stimuli on auditory evoked potentials.
    Haaland KY
    Neuropsychologia; 1974 Jul; 12(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 4419531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Lateral differences in the dynamics of latent periods of a simple motor response to acoustic stimuli of increasing intensity].
    Vol'f NV; Tsvetovskiĭ SB
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1985; 11(6):989-92. PubMed ID: 4076695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interhemispheric integration in man.
    Wyke M
    Psychol Med; 1982 May; 12(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 7100345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Latency variation of auditory N1m responses to vocal and nonvocal sounds.
    Mizuochi T; Yumoto M; Karino S; Itoh K; Yamasoba T
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1945-9. PubMed ID: 18007192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Characteristics of human auditory evoked potentials during lateralization of a "moving" acoustic pattern].
    Al'tman IaA; Belov IM; Vaĭtulevich SF; Mal'tseva NV
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1982; 32(3):472-9. PubMed ID: 7113449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Considerations on the cerebral organization of left-handed persons].
    Agostini L; Piccirilli M
    Riv Neurol; 1983; 53(5):306-18. PubMed ID: 6198709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hemispheric prevalence in acoustical attention.
    Mazzucchi A; Cattelani R; Umiltà C
    Brain Cogn; 1983 Jan; 2(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 6546008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Transiently evoked otoacoustic emission amplitudes change with changes of directed attention.
    Froehlich P; Collet L; Morgon A
    Physiol Behav; 1993 Apr; 53(4):679-82. PubMed ID: 8511172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.